I am generally chastised for the way I construct my headlines, but in no way can Talbot be criticised for his? It points no fingers, which if truths known some of the usual suspects began to get a little jittery about.
I think that Togo managed to get it right when he posted:
Talbot, your first (rather unnecessary) response to me was 'You think it best news of this nature should be ignored (which you could easily have done) Zacs, sj?'
I had made no comment about it being ignored and (as I have said repeatedly) I had seen it on other internet sources.
Your suggestion that i thought it should be ignored was completely nonfactual. It also suggests you thought you were the first person to bring this to everyones' attention.
There does tend to be some strangely ghoulish delight in being the first to post bad news stories on here.
Talbot often works in Germany. He sees and hears different things to most of us.
I read his posts knowing, after talking to him for many years, that he's not racist, he's not homophobic...etc etc...he's shows concern. And he knows that when someone shows concern they are put down...
You haven't answered my question. You mentioned me specifically and asked me whether I thought it best that news such as this be ignored. Why did you do that?