Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Khan Again
https:/ /www.da ilystar .co.uk/ news/la test-ne ws/7109 77/Sadi q-Khan- London- Mayor-s econd-t erm-202 0-Donal d-Trump Would you vote for him this time?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by thesshhh. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Fought to get this man into the country
http:// news.bb c.co.uk /2/hi/i n_depth /uk/200 0/newsm akers/1 874787. stm
Now compare that to his stance on Trump.
http://
Now compare that to his stance on Trump.
I vividly remember his hate speech vid.
I remember because of the question he read out about FGM.
He used it as an example of hate speech and yet the author was a former Muslim who had been the victim of FGM.
I just had a google to find ot what Shazia Hobbs had to say about Khan using her tweet.
WARNING this video contains footage of Tommy Robinson.
I remember because of the question he read out about FGM.
He used it as an example of hate speech and yet the author was a former Muslim who had been the victim of FGM.
I just had a google to find ot what Shazia Hobbs had to say about Khan using her tweet.
WARNING this video contains footage of Tommy Robinson.
// knife crime in London is a 'Black' problem and the Black community must accept an increased police presence in their areas //
There is a disproportionate high rate of black people commiting, and being the victim of knife attacks in London.
But over 50% of knife crime involves white attackers and victims. So to dismiss it as a black problem is incorrect.
In 2009 (the last full year of a Labour Government, there were 88,000 stop and searches in London. Last year with thousands less police officers at its disposal, the Met made less than 20,000 Stop & Searches.
https:/ /ichef. bbci.co .uk/new s/660/c psprodp b/E308/ product ion/_99 702185_ chart-k nives_s topsear ch-8b83 i-nc.pn g
And nationally, knife crime is up slightly more at 22% in England and Wales. So the reason for the increase is likely to be the same everywhere, not just because the capital has more black people.
There is a disproportionate high rate of black people commiting, and being the victim of knife attacks in London.
But over 50% of knife crime involves white attackers and victims. So to dismiss it as a black problem is incorrect.
In 2009 (the last full year of a Labour Government, there were 88,000 stop and searches in London. Last year with thousands less police officers at its disposal, the Met made less than 20,000 Stop & Searches.
https:/
And nationally, knife crime is up slightly more at 22% in England and Wales. So the reason for the increase is likely to be the same everywhere, not just because the capital has more black people.
A Freedom of Information request to the Met.
https:/ /www.wh atdothe yknow.c om/requ est/797 68/resp onse/19 5247/at tach/3/ D%20Lin do%20Re ply.pdf
https:/
Of course, what should be included as an option on the ballot paper (but which will never be included in either the near or distant future) is “Would you like the post of Mayor of London, together with the Greater London Assembly, abolished?”
There is simply no need for either. Mrs Thatcher went to great lengths to abolish the Greater London Council (together with six other Metropolitan Councils) in 1986. London managed perfectly well without the GLC (with the functions transferred to other bodies – mainly London’s 32 local Borough Councils). This worked perfectly well and nobody (bar the second rate politicians who love alternative career paths when they are unsuccessful at Westminster) missed the GLC.
It was Labour’s obsession with “local democracy” (more probably for the reason above rather than any love affair with democracy) that gave Londoner’s the chance to resurrect the GLC under the guise of allowing them to have a Mayor who would look after their interests. In the referendum of 1998 less than 25% of those eligible to vote voted for the change.
There is just no need for a Mayor of London or an elected assembly.
There is simply no need for either. Mrs Thatcher went to great lengths to abolish the Greater London Council (together with six other Metropolitan Councils) in 1986. London managed perfectly well without the GLC (with the functions transferred to other bodies – mainly London’s 32 local Borough Councils). This worked perfectly well and nobody (bar the second rate politicians who love alternative career paths when they are unsuccessful at Westminster) missed the GLC.
It was Labour’s obsession with “local democracy” (more probably for the reason above rather than any love affair with democracy) that gave Londoner’s the chance to resurrect the GLC under the guise of allowing them to have a Mayor who would look after their interests. In the referendum of 1998 less than 25% of those eligible to vote voted for the change.
There is just no need for a Mayor of London or an elected assembly.
https:/ /www.st andard. co.uk/n ews/pol itics/s adiq-kh an-i-d- do-ever ything- in-my-p ower-to -cut-st op-and- search- a292470 6.html
from the article.
\\The Met dramatically reduced the number of random stop and searches in 2012 in an effort to improve relations with black and ethnic minority communities//
well, that worked out well then didn't it.
from the article.
\\The Met dramatically reduced the number of random stop and searches in 2012 in an effort to improve relations with black and ethnic minority communities//
well, that worked out well then didn't it.