back on the merry-go-round.
The strongest argument in support of the "moron" accusation is that Robinson stood outside a court house commenting on a rape trial when he was already on a suspended sentence for standing outside - OK, technically inside - a court house commenting on a rape trial. (In fact he's done a number of these stupid self-defeating things.) If, however, you saw his speech at the Oxford Union which was well-received (and where he was treated with more courtesy than he got from a superannuated Jeremy Paxman, and far more than he got from an odiously offensive Piers Morgan) might cause you to reassess the "moron" bit.
Now on the other charges of racism and inciting religious division. (What follows, by the way, from Robinson's own description in the speech at the OU mentioned above). The foundation of the EDL was triggered by a particular incident - the openly hostile reception given to returning British troop by some local Muslims (it was on the news at the time), but was actually based on the long-standing perception (right or wrong) that Luton's Muslim community was aggressively self-aware, self-segregating and included a large number of a particular sort of sexual predator. Robinson attributed this anti-social character to the ideology of Islam, which he came to believe was an intolerant, supremacist and totalitarian system. That's why, after he left the EDL, he worked briefly with Maajid Nawaz at the Quilliam Foundation who was fighting the "extreme" interpretations of Islam from a different angle. So that's got rid of the "racist" charge, hasn't it? And it ought to have got rid of the "religious division" one too: Robinson's grudge was not with Mormonism or Sikhism, it was with Islam alone.