Nice To See That The Young Royals Are Bringing Their Children Up Correctly.

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5935339/Princess-Charlottes-cheeky-comment-Prince-Louis-christening.html

Not very nice for a three year old to speak to adults in such a way, don't you think?

/// She may be only three-years-old, but Princess Charlotte showed off her confident nature with a cheeky remark as she left her brother Prince Louis' christening. ///

/// The little Princess who was walking hand-in-hand with her father Prince William after the service at the Royal Chapel at St James's Palace told waiting photographers: 'You're not coming.' ///

/// To make sure her point was understood she kept a watchful eye on the media pack over her shoulder to ensure everyone remained in
place. ///

[ummmm]

I think AOG is forgetting that the young royals have a very well trained nanny.

[maggiebee]

Wow, a 3 year old makes a comment and suddenly it's world news. Think we've got more to worry about than this trivia.

[ummmm]

Think before you post then, Spath.

[anotheoldgit]

jackthehat

/// "You're barely older than a child yourself....." ///

She doesn't spathiphyllum, she just makes wild and often incorrect guesses and also turns to insults, when anyone dares to hold a different opinion to herself.

It's called "scraping the bottom of the barrel", so I am told.

[Rockrose]

She is 3 years old - how much experience do you have with 3 year olds
spathiphyllum?

[ummmm]

AOG - Utter tosh!

Rockrose...by the sounds of it no experience whatsoever!

[jackthehat]

Does anyone have a pot to hand......there's a kettle up there^ I'd like to introduce it to.

spath - It's hard to explain things to the clueless.

[anotheoldgit]

Barmaid

/// How on earth you can call a 3 year old malicious when all she's done is given a bit of a grumpy look is beyond me. ///

Firstly no one said she was malicious and secondly she is not being criticised for "giving a bit of a grumpy look".

If you haven't read the article she is being accused for telling certain adults that they are not coming to the christening.

And where would the Royals be without those photo opportunities, providing that they have been invited of course.

Perhaps in this case the photographers should have all turned around and ignored this occasion?

[ummmm]

Spath said it, AOG.

[jackthehat]

The paps had already had their photo-ops. At this point the family were leaving to go to a post-baptismal party........one to which the photographers were not invited (and I bet they already knew that) and reminded of such by the young Princess.

[Rockrose]

//It wasn't just what she said, it was the looks and attitude emitted after she said it.. Bit malicious imo. //

She has been called malicious.

[jackthehat]

I rather think (if things run to course) that we'll be told shortly that 'Malicious' wasn't actually the word that he meant.....that being something more like 'mischievous'.

[Rockrose]

//the paps were there in case someone fell over or in case of a wardrobe malfunction //

They were there to cover a Royal Christening.