ChatterBank0 min ago
Fired For Refusing Poppies?
245 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.com/n ews/uk- england -birmin gham-46 078099
that's how the headline reads - but it's not how it was reported on TV last night, nor indeed is it said in the text of the article. The police are investigating not the refusal, but threats made after the event. and the driver wasn't dismissed for refusing to transport poppies, but for falsifying his job card.
all very strange, eh?
that's how the headline reads - but it's not how it was reported on TV last night, nor indeed is it said in the text of the article. The police are investigating not the refusal, but threats made after the event. and the driver wasn't dismissed for refusing to transport poppies, but for falsifying his job card.
all very strange, eh?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Corby - // "no evidence, apart from fundamental prejudice on the part of observers"
Why do those posts not fall under the category of "content deemed to be Racist, Intolerant or Bigoted." then? //
I think that differing opinions have to be acceptable, or else the News section would wither and die.
Personally I can accept a view which to me is bigoted and ignorant, and as this debate shows, I have done so.
If I thought someone was seriously out of line in terms of expressing real hatred, then that would be an issue to address.
Why do those posts not fall under the category of "content deemed to be Racist, Intolerant or Bigoted." then? //
I think that differing opinions have to be acceptable, or else the News section would wither and die.
Personally I can accept a view which to me is bigoted and ignorant, and as this debate shows, I have done so.
If I thought someone was seriously out of line in terms of expressing real hatred, then that would be an issue to address.
It's interesting that the contents of the box/es is what has stimulate this mass outcry , of course they symbolise such a lot to us and it feels hurtful.
However if we strip this back down then this driver is rubbish for whatever his reasoning was and indeed his 'persuasion' (as someone put it earlier) , because he falsified his records to the booking office.
As I stated earler, I hope the Council look again at his right to hold a licence to ply his trade.
However if we strip this back down then this driver is rubbish for whatever his reasoning was and indeed his 'persuasion' (as someone put it earlier) , because he falsified his records to the booking office.
As I stated earler, I hope the Council look again at his right to hold a licence to ply his trade.
Mamya - // However if we strip this back down then this driver is rubbish for whatever his reasoning was and indeed his 'persuasion' (as someone put it earlier) , because he falsified his records to the booking office. //
I am happy to agree with the first half of that observation - he has behaved in an unacceptable fashion and failed to complete his duties - but he doesn't have to be a Muslim to do that - and there is no firm indication to support the notions that he is a Muslim, or that being a Muslim made him fail to do his job.
Let's make sure the guy has committed the crime, before he hang him for it, what do you say?
I am happy to agree with the first half of that observation - he has behaved in an unacceptable fashion and failed to complete his duties - but he doesn't have to be a Muslim to do that - and there is no firm indication to support the notions that he is a Muslim, or that being a Muslim made him fail to do his job.
Let's make sure the guy has committed the crime, before he hang him for it, what do you say?
-- answer removed --
jack-the-hat
/// and that is if any of those posters who have jumped to conclusions have the cojones to re-visit this post and proffer an apology in the first place. ///
Why would they bother, when there are posters who would class their apologies as being "mealy-mouthed, at best, and full of self-justification at worst...."
/// and that is if any of those posters who have jumped to conclusions have the cojones to re-visit this post and proffer an apology in the first place. ///
Why would they bother, when there are posters who would class their apologies as being "mealy-mouthed, at best, and full of self-justification at worst...."
AOG - // Why would they bother, when there are posters who would class their apologies as being "mealy-mouthed, at best, and full of self-justification at worst...." //
I think an apology is as much for the benefit of the person offering it, as it is for the recipient.
I have offered apologies on here, which have been roundly rebuffed, but I still feel better knowing I have done the right thing. I cannot control the recipient's reactions, but that is not the entire reason to apologise.
I think an apology is as much for the benefit of the person offering it, as it is for the recipient.
I have offered apologies on here, which have been roundly rebuffed, but I still feel better knowing I have done the right thing. I cannot control the recipient's reactions, but that is not the entire reason to apologise.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
I’m off to wait till The Pack finds another invented Bone to snarl over, but first I’d like to say that even as an unrepentant Marxist who thinks the first World War was fought for entirely the wrong (Imperialist) reasons, I thoroughly support the British Legion and the Poppy Day appeal.
As, I am sure, do millions of Muslims.
As, I am sure, do millions of Muslims.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.