Donate SIGN UP

Looks Like The P M Has It Nailed Already.

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 13:34 Wed 12th Dec 2018 | News
157 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

101 to 120 of 157rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
no to another referendum, we voted once, that should be it. Democracy in action.
If you get this deal, and you hate it, how is that democracy, as you define it, in action?

The alternative is to let MPs to decide on what will, effectively, be a choice between this deal and remaining; you can be fairly certain that leaving under No Deal is off the agenda as far as Parliament is concerned.
well we won;t know unless she calls a vote on it.
no one likes the deal, its not as i said fit for purpose.
i don't hate it, it just doesn't work.
Democracy allows people to change their minds. If yesterday's vote had gone the other way we'd have ended up with a third general election in four years, but I didn't hear anyone protest that this would be undemocratic.
no it would have been a leadership challenge surely.
that didn't happen as Mrs May won the vote.
i and others like me haven't changed their minds about Brexit. Its only a small number but i haven't found but one remainer in the whole lot.
I'm not saying that you personally have changed your mind, although other Leavers may have -- or, as we've seen with respect to one or two on here, may never vote again anyway.

The point is that if Parliament doesn't vote the way you want it to then your only opportunity to force Leaving the EU without this deal is to say so a second time in a second referendum. It is, I suggest, self-defeating to refuse even to contemplate this idea.

Of course, from my point of view I want to vote to stay in a second time, but the beauty of democracy is that all voices can be heard. Right now, neither yours nor mine is being heard -- certainly not by Theresa May, anyway, who as the person in charge is pushing through a plan that we both hate.

Hi danny not seen one mp from either side stand up with a solution for all this mess.yes may has been totally useless during brexit but i dont see anyone coming forwards to take over and sort it out.
Brexit is a no brainer no one is going to be happy about the final outcome..
Jim // No Deal is off the agenda as far as Parliament is concerned.//
If this is so certain then why has every government department got a Minister for no deal.
why have some businesses gearing up for a No Deal...
danny/emmy: Government (and businesses) can prepare for No Deal as much as it likes (and is not really preparing that much anyway, which is perhaps a serious mistake) -- but at some point Parliament is likely to assert its will and stop a No Deal exit. Whether that's accepting the Withdrawal Agreement in its current (or a slightly modified) form, or introducing some emergency legislation to extend or rescind A50 notification, I don't know, but it seems a pretty safe bet that the UK won't leave without a deal, on March 29th or any other date, at least not if Parliament is the final arbiter on this matter.

As I say, my preferred course of action would be for Parliament to reject this deal and then go on to cancel Brexit altogether, either before or after putting the question back to the people. My point, though, is that this really ought to be your preferred course too -- not so much the stopping Brexit bit, obviously, but if you hate the Deal but still want to Leave then your only hope is to force Parliament to do this by saying so a second time in a referendum.
that would take longer than we have, we are due to leave on March 29th, to organise another vote would take months surely.
Jim, to stop Brexit will require an act of parliament, and if the Tories take such an action it will be a betrayal of the referendum result.
so it would.
Emmie, it would take months as that also would require an Act of parliament.
yes i thought as much..
Question Author
jim 13:32, if there is another vote it should be a carbon copy of the last one. The Leave option naturally implies leave with no deal, given what has gone on up to now. However that would be a betrayal, I think we now should leave with no deal and firefight the issues. It would be troublesome in the short term but the medium to long term would be a lot better than the vassal deal on the table.
TTT couldn't agree more.
-- answer removed --

101 to 120 of 157rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Looks Like The P M Has It Nailed Already.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.