News1 min ago
Should The Queen Suspend Parliament?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
You'd just like to see them voted out?
Fair enough, but that seems quite mild considering you've openly called Theresa May (and presumably anyone who has assisted her) treasonous, which is a crime. In fact it looks a bit like your repeated use of the words 'treachery' and 'treason' to describe politicians is actually just hot air.
Fair enough, but that seems quite mild considering you've openly called Theresa May (and presumably anyone who has assisted her) treasonous, which is a crime. In fact it looks a bit like your repeated use of the words 'treachery' and 'treason' to describe politicians is actually just hot air.
Mssrs (poison dwarf) Bercow & (Mr Punch look alike) Grieve, are not only trying to work on a particular kind of Brexit, but to stop it all together by subterfuge. Whether you agree with Brexit or not, if they were to succeed in this by trickery - which has been already started by Bercow - they would unleash civil unrest not seen in England since the civil war (imo).
Brexit is about sovereignty of the UK government/parliament. But there is a special case when the government/parliament fails to act according to the expressed democratic wishes of the people. In that case it has abused what sovereignty it has, and folk will call for ways to ensure democracy wins through.
Somewhat ironic when a parliament, overall, so wants to be told what to enforce upon their nation, rather than do their job, that they try as hard as possible to avoid the necessary sovereignty being returned to them.
Royal takeover is a very risky option though since it is effectively a step backwards. Parliament needs to start taking it's duty seriously rather than look for the easy path.
Somewhat ironic when a parliament, overall, so wants to be told what to enforce upon their nation, rather than do their job, that they try as hard as possible to avoid the necessary sovereignty being returned to them.
Royal takeover is a very risky option though since it is effectively a step backwards. Parliament needs to start taking it's duty seriously rather than look for the easy path.
"Sums up Philip Hammond ?"
Indeed it does. But in this instance he is absolutely right. Leaving without a "deal" will not be countenanced by MPs under any circumstances. I know it is the default position but the default will not prevail. "Leaving" under the EU's one and only so-called deal on offer was soundly and quite rightly rejected. The EU will not renegotiate it and in any case it has so many shortcomings that a little teak here and there will make no difference.
So what does that leave?
Indeed it does. But in this instance he is absolutely right. Leaving without a "deal" will not be countenanced by MPs under any circumstances. I know it is the default position but the default will not prevail. "Leaving" under the EU's one and only so-called deal on offer was soundly and quite rightly rejected. The EU will not renegotiate it and in any case it has so many shortcomings that a little teak here and there will make no difference.
So what does that leave?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.