Here's A Right Little Charmer Of An M S P........

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-47028246
wonder if this little Tish Gab can comprehend that T G M is one of the reasons he can spout this cobras.

[Jackdaw33]

I gave a clue @ 22.02

[jim360]

So you did. Really it's an unnecessary distraction. Better to call the MSP a berk or equivalent and be done with it, rather than try none-too-subtly to fool the censors.

[Peter Pedant]

// //Is 3T gracing us with English to day ?// Who's asking?

are - First Sea Lord, Colonial Secretary, Chancellor, Italy
and of course Yalta - - are they all Very Hard Words and need translation ?
Oh dear .... well this is AB - and at night ....

[Jackdaw33]

Do you know the origin of the term 'berk'? It's shortened rhyming slang and much more offensive than what TTT said.

[jim360]

That's why it's so much more perfect, though. It's become a surprisingly mild insult when it could just as equally be the strongest, to those in the know. But they can never explain it :)

But anyway.

[-Talbot-]

so how did he win the war ?
he didnt the americans did



Do you think if Britain had rolled over like much of Europe the Americans could have ventured to Europe and beat the nazis?
America didn't win the war, you buffoon.

[Mamyalynne]

Purely for the sake of clarity, I was referring to this rendition by the OP...

// gawd help us TVI part Deux has stirred, someone translate please.//

...and, no I don't need any clues - I know fine well what it means.

Result - death of civilised debate.

[douglas9401]

Would that not be 'bark'?

[shoota]

There are many other hunts available...

[jim360]

You can have all sorts of fun deciding who won the war. My own version would be something along the lines of the US winning it, but Britain making sure that it would not be lost.

[Jackdaw33]

No, it is pronounced 'Burkly' contrary to common English usage.

[Khandro]

Right little charmer, or ginger turd;
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1078974/Winston-Churchill-white-supremacist-piers-morgan-bbc-politics-live?utm_source=spotim&utm_medium=spotim_recirculation&spotim_referrer=recirculation

[douglas9401]

Helen would be my choice.

[douglas9401]

A Nightingale Sang In Burkley Square.

From the album Revisionism To Make Tish Fit?

[Kromovaracun]

//it takes one aspect of a complex situation and promotes it as a deliberate act of malice. A load of TROB snowflakes will want to believe it and that denigrates the memory of the Greatest Briton, that's the harm kromo.//

The 'harm' you are describing is thought crime, 3T. Notice that his argument was effectively (and politely) disassembled by all the panelists. Nobody interrupted anyone else. Nobody called anyone any names, as appears to be the instinctive response on the Answerbank. There was a perfectly decent discussion about the topic (or as decent as you can get in 4 minutes on morning TV). There's nothing dangerous about the view he is expressing - he isn't advocating hate or violence, he's expressing opinions about history that you and I find distasteful and inaccurate. It's allowed.

[Jackdaw33]

It's only Burkley in Berkley Hunt otherwise it's Barkley.

[ToraToraTora]

yes but taking one aspect in isolation is surely misrepresenting subject. Yes it's allowed, as is mine and others response to it.

[Kromovaracun]

Also I find it very ironic that you mention 'TROB snowflakes' and then spend your evening whingeing about what is essentially a difference of opinion.

[ToraToraTora]

It's not a difference of opinion, it's a deliberate misrepresentation. Dislike Churchill by all means but have the courage to research and evaluate what you are using to denigrate, fairly rather than cherry picking aspects to make a pre ordained view.

[New Judge]

"Would that not be 'bark'?"

No, it wouldn't:

https://www.berkeleyhunt.co.uk/