Business & Finance2 mins ago
Not Sure If This Is Allowed
https:/
read this earlier and just felt so sad
read this earlier and just felt so sad
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bednobs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
the power to arrest under suspicion
is pretty weak
retro will give you chapter and verse
"anything which is not fanciful" - ( is used for money laundering )
since the parents were there and are alive and four kids are dead suspecting them is not fanciful at all ....
charging them is a different matter
when discussion should stop BUT the authorities are pretty supine when it comes to speculation in the social media ....
is pretty weak
retro will give you chapter and verse
"anything which is not fanciful" - ( is used for money laundering )
since the parents were there and are alive and four kids are dead suspecting them is not fanciful at all ....
charging them is a different matter
when discussion should stop BUT the authorities are pretty supine when it comes to speculation in the social media ....
BEDNOBS, on the CPS website it says,
"Gross Negligence Manslaughter
This is where the death is a result of a grossly negligent (though otherwise lawful) act or omission on the part of the defendant. The law in respect of this has been clarified in the case of R v Adomako (1994) 3 All ER 79 where a four stage test for gross negligence manslaughter known as the Adomako Test was outlined by the House of Lords:
The test involves the following stages:
a) the existence of a duty of care to the deceased;
b) a breach of that duty of care which;
c) causes (or significantly contributes) to the death of the victim; and
d) the breach should be characterised as gross negligence, and therefore a crime."
"Gross Negligence Manslaughter
This is where the death is a result of a grossly negligent (though otherwise lawful) act or omission on the part of the defendant. The law in respect of this has been clarified in the case of R v Adomako (1994) 3 All ER 79 where a four stage test for gross negligence manslaughter known as the Adomako Test was outlined by the House of Lords:
The test involves the following stages:
a) the existence of a duty of care to the deceased;
b) a breach of that duty of care which;
c) causes (or significantly contributes) to the death of the victim; and
d) the breach should be characterised as gross negligence, and therefore a crime."
