I've said many times how many young boys have their genitalia mutilated. I usually bring up this fact during discussions about Female Genitalia Mutilation and people suppress the fact it happens to males. yes it may be in better conditions and circumstances, but it still happens.
No in my opinion it shouldn't be, but nor is the information suppressed, it's readily available and common knowledge. Is male circumcision comparable with female circumcision- no it's not, which is why FGM gets more press, but plenty of people elect not to circumcise their sons even amongst the Jewish community, so the disdain of it is spreading.
My life was vastly improved after I was circumcised for medical reasons as an adult.
That this young man committed suicide is tragic, but who knows how he would have dealt with his situation had he not had the procedure - he had it because he was having problems with his penis.
I didn't know circumcision was a social norm, but if you say it is and your graph seems suggest it may well be, then, no, I don't think that it should be.
Ummmm read my OP a bit more slowely. " I usually bring up this fact during discussions about Female Genitalia Mutilation and people suppress the fact it happens to males. yes it may be in better conditions and circumstances, but it still happens. " "yes it may be in better conditions and circumstances, but it still happens. "
"a boy missing his foreskin" how can boys miss something that was stolen from them at birth??
Aesthetically penises are interesting, you can have very beautiful ones and very ugly ones, much like their female counterparts I imagine, that can be true whether they are circumcised or not.
But the principle behind male circumcision is not to deprive the male of sexual pleasure whereas that is a fundamental reason for female circumcision, it's an attempt to control girl's behaviour amongst other things.