It's Sudan not South Sudan. Urgent question asked in the House of Commons this morning. https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2019/june/urgent-question-as-crisis-in-sudan-intensifies/
which people? google "south sudan" on the news tab, there's loads of hits from all sorts of sources - reliable sources such as Reuters, as well as UK publications. if there's any attempt at supression it's failing.
if there was a civil war here, the authorities would do the same; and outside observers would be in the same situation as we are now. you've read, and you've highlighted, so we've read. beyond that, there's not much we can do. we could lobby our own parliament, but what good would that do? we could muster a relief fund but until the war ends there would be no way of delivering anything meaningful. the UN can tut at the Sudanese authorities but they will be ignored.
AB often just discusses things and tries to highlight aspects of them without having to actively physically do something about the issues we're discussing.
Mushroom, then it is shameful of the UN. They need to provide strong action.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.