Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Cyclist To Pay Compensation To Woman Who Walked Into Road While Looking At Mobile Phone.
108 Answers
Is the judge's verdict fair?
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-7 152963/ Yoga-te acher-s taring- phone-h it-cycl ist-win s-compe nsation .html
https:/
Answers
In Australia it is also an ambiguous situation. A pedestrian who walks into the path of a vehicle is at fault. However a vehicle must give way to a pedestrian who has already begun to cross the road. When someone steps onto the road they become a road user and I believe they should have a duty to pay attention. Any other road user looking at their phone is committing...
11:29 Tue 18th Jun 2019
"'Ms Brushett must clearly have equal responsibility if she is crossing the road without looking - and if she is looking at her phone, even more so,' she said."
(she being the judge!)
Many eye witnesses, and those involved in the accident confirm she was looking at her phone. So she is more to blame?
(she being the judge!)
Many eye witnesses, and those involved in the accident confirm she was looking at her phone. So she is more to blame?
In Australia it is also an ambiguous situation. A pedestrian who walks into the path of a vehicle is at fault. However a vehicle must give way to a pedestrian who has already begun to cross the road.
When someone steps onto the road they become a road user and I believe they should have a duty to pay attention. Any other road user looking at their phone is committing an offence.
She also made a bad decision by turning around at the last moment. The cyclist was probably going behind her by then as she walk into his path for the second time.
He probably need a better lawyer.
When someone steps onto the road they become a road user and I believe they should have a duty to pay attention. Any other road user looking at their phone is committing an offence.
She also made a bad decision by turning around at the last moment. The cyclist was probably going behind her by then as she walk into his path for the second time.
He probably need a better lawyer.
To me, it sounds like the cyclist (backed up by multiple witnesses) made every attempt he could to not hit the pedestrian. Where as, it seems the pedestrian was too engrossed in her phone to realise not only she was about to be hit, but to realise which direction she needed to go in to avoid damage.
// 'Even where a motorist or cyclist had the right of way, pedestrians who are established on the road have right of way. //
..said the judge. Fair enough then, he was at fault. It's a bit like if you hit another car from behind. It's your fault. It doesn't matter that they slammed the brakes on for no reason whatsoever, it's still your fault.
..said the judge. Fair enough then, he was at fault. It's a bit like if you hit another car from behind. It's your fault. It doesn't matter that they slammed the brakes on for no reason whatsoever, it's still your fault.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.