Is Piers Morgan Right About Meghan?

[thesshhh]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7298003/PIERS-MORGAN-Meghans-shamelessly-hypocritical-Vogue-stunt.html

[aelmpvw]

^ for a moment there i thought you'd brought boris into the argument

[dannyk13]

Bobbysox //Thing is , no one knows the inside working of The Firm//
Totally agree.

[Bobbisox1]

Ael, advice from Boris on how to behave, I'd pay to watch that one , haha

[LadyCG]

I think Piers has a point.

[Sqad]

O.K I got carried away with my circulation figures, but you get my point...;-)

danny......I disagree....the Queen is very diplomatic, she would give Charles the first bite of the cherry to sort out his family problems and if this failed THEN she would have intervened.

[dannyk13]

Sqad, as Morgan says that the palace agreed to it, I can't see that there was any problem in the first place. It is so easy to snipe at an easy target who can't hit back.

[Sqad]

danny....the palace agreed to WHAT?

Sniping is a strong word, I wouldn't use it, but if you think it is applicable........then fine.

[dannyk13]

Sqad //Sqad danny....the palace agreed to WHAT? //
Read the link paragraph 4.

[Rockrose]

Of course its sniping - there have been accusations of her trapping him, that she doesn't love him, that she will divorce him in 3 years etc etc.
The people making these accusations have not got a clue and are quite frankly being complete wassaks!

[Sqad]

danny.

"News that Buckingham Palace has let her do it is a big surprise though, because Meghan is now supposed to be a member of the royal family and not a publicity-craving celebrity."

Ah! yes........but I thought on AB that it was a hazardous process in believing what the press says.....but I take your point.
However i would rather believe mrs sqad and her mates ..;-)

[Old_Geezer]

Amusing. I tend not to take a lot of interest in royal family nonsense because they are fairly useless most of the time, and where they are useful it's only because our political system hasn't been overhauled to avoid the sovereign needing to get involved. For the most part they've not got a sensible role and are simply recipients of the largest SS cheques. An anachronism. But on a whim, I checked the article. If true it is quite something. Made me grin anyway.

[NellieMay]

Perhaps though this will be a new focus for those that are still thriving on Diana gossip 22 years on.

[teacake44]

Not a fan of royalty, but in her defence if you like, who wouldn't choose an exciting day out, rather than make yourself available to greet a clap trap like Trump, as for the other clap trap, ( Morgan) he will dig dirt wherever he can to earn a crust. Don't lets forget why Morgan was sacked from being an editor. I believe he tried to disgrace the British army, to sell papers. He as not changed any.

[anotheoldgit]

Rockrose

/// He is bitter, but to be honest the bile directed at DOS is quite sickening especially as none of the people know her just what is written in the paper. ///

/// 9 Stories in the DM yesterday about her - the media is stirring up the hatred towards her.
Nobody knows this woman but there are several out there that claim she is classless and conniving - what do they base this on?
Certainly not personal knowledge! ///

And I suppose you and others like you, contain a personal knowledge about President Trump, but it doesn't stop you and others from directing your bile towards the President or any other celebrity that you have taken a dislike to, so why should this 'Royal' be any different?

[Rockrose]

Well we know the reason you don't like the DoS don't we AOG and its not because she's American!

[jno]

so many people around here constantly demanding that the royals get a job ... but as soon as one of them does ...

[andy-hughes]

AOG - // And I suppose you and others like you, contain a personal knowledge about President Trump, but it doesn't stop you and others from directing your bile towards the President or any other celebrity that you have taken a dislike to, so why should this 'Royal' be any different? //

There is absolutely no comparison between the Duchess and the President.

The point being debated is the Duchess's recent actions, which she undertakes as a member of the Royal Family, and as such she has absolutely no right of reply in either defence or explanation of what she does and says.

This is a situation she has undertaken willingly and with complete prior knowledge, but the absence of a right of reply does mean that it is open season on her in the media.

The President on the other hand, has rather too much freedom to promote his obnoxious personal views via his Twitter account - he can defend himself as often and as much as he pleases from the attacks against himself which he gleefully orchestrates and clearly relishes.

As I say - no comparison.

[Rockrose]

Personal knowledge of trump?
Just what he prints himself with his very own words

[dave50]

Didn't Prince Philip once warn Harry by saying, “One steps out with actresses, one doesn’t marry them”?

[dannyk13]

Did you overhear that Dave,or is it just tosh?