Whipped For Loving..

[fender62]

religion of peace..mmm the face of islam you do not see on bbc, i wonder why..guess trump is more news worthy, considered a racist..but hey whats happening is ok though.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7306503/Woman-breaks-publicly-whipped-100-times-having-pre-marital-sex-Indonesia.html#comments

[sandyRoe]

I wonder if her partner get similar punishment? It takes two to tango.

[ummmm]

It says in the bullet points he did.

[sandyRoe]

Still wrong. What a world we live in.

[Baldric]

Sandy, it's in the link

// A couple, both 22, were whipped 100 times each for having pre-marital sex //

[andy-hughes]

Naomi - // AH, All the information is there for anyone who cares to look. //

My Sunday School teacher teacher used to say that - I didn't believe him either, for exactly the same reason - I realised he didn't know any more than I do, he just decided he did, and told everyone.

[andy-hughes]

AOG - //
Well there you have it, they are clearly uncivilised, then being civilised as we are, that makes us better or indeed superior to them, which in turn by the definition of racism, that also makes you a racist Andy. //

I did hope that you would maybe think about the dreadful insult you have offered in that post, and retract it, but I am not at all surprised that you as you always do when exposed as wrong - you have simply walked away.

I have decided on an appropriate course of action.

[naomi24]

AH, hmmm .... your Sunday School
Teacher boasting eh? Never a good trait. Clearly a poor role model.

[vetuste_ennemi]

God knows why Naomi (or anyone else for that matter) continues to "engage" (not really the right word, is it?) with someone who lacks the basic moral quality needed to discuss honestly any point of difference: you believe A, I believe B; is our disagreement over the facts? In which case let's examine the facts; or do we, perhaps, agree about the facts, but disagree about the methods by which we mitigate harm and promote good.

The latter is the usual case: we agree broadly about the facts, but differ strongly on the means by which we redress social evils. And that's why we have political parties offering alternative solutions.

If you are unprepared to examine evidence, on the other hand, or deny facts which are staring you in the face, there's obviously a place for you somewhere, but that place is not an institution of democratic governance.

[retrocop]

v.e.
//God knows why Naomi (or anyone else for that matter) continues to "engage" (not really the right word, is it?) with someone who lacks the basic moral quality needed to discuss honestly any point of difference: //

hmmmm. Wish I had a pound for every time I thought the same.

[ladybirder]

You're not alone Retro, believe me.
Well said v_e.