ChatterBank2 mins ago
Should We Still Be Paying For The Sins Of Some Of Our Fore Fathers?
68 Answers
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ uk-news /2019/a ug/23/g lasgow- univers ity-sla ve-trad e-repar ations
In fact hasn't the time now come to forget what happened so far back in history, as this sort of thing only alienates once race against another?
In fact hasn't the time now come to forget what happened so far back in history, as this sort of thing only alienates once race against another?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Absolutely ridiculous..but to be expected from the loony lefties on a big black guilt trip that infects these organisations...
Wonder when Italy/ Romans will be apologising etc for their slave days...and the Incas and the Mayans for their exploits with slavery..etc etc...
Oh i see its just the UK that has these fools that want to salve their conscience so they can feel all warm and tingly inside and feel good about themselves
Wonder when Italy/ Romans will be apologising etc for their slave days...and the Incas and the Mayans for their exploits with slavery..etc etc...
Oh i see its just the UK that has these fools that want to salve their conscience so they can feel all warm and tingly inside and feel good about themselves
I don't think that black people today realise the terrible atrocities that their Muslim ancestors inflicted on the world . The Barbary pirates trawled the world capturing white people to enslave them. No country, including Britain escaped their clutches. Moroccan Sultans bought and sold white people like they were trinkets.
White people have a terrible record when it comes to slavery but the black people need to be made more aware of their own heritage.
Anyone interested in reading up on this subject should read -------------White Gold by Giles Milton.
White people have a terrible record when it comes to slavery but the black people need to be made more aware of their own heritage.
Anyone interested in reading up on this subject should read -------------White Gold by Giles Milton.
Today's African ny origin populations of the Caribbean, North America and the UK owe a great debt to the evils of the slave trade (as one early poster pointed out): the trade-of between the appalling suffering of their remote ancestors and the privileged lives they enjoy in the societies of the former enslavers.
"Roots", Mr Haley? Name me one single country in Africa which you would prefer to the USA. Or one single city in Africa which you would find more congenial to live in than NY or LA.
PS: did a poster mention the Islamic slave trade? Slavery has never been endorsed or justified by Islam. The mere suggestion is hate speech.
"Roots", Mr Haley? Name me one single country in Africa which you would prefer to the USA. Or one single city in Africa which you would find more congenial to live in than NY or LA.
PS: did a poster mention the Islamic slave trade? Slavery has never been endorsed or justified by Islam. The mere suggestion is hate speech.
// PS: did a poster mention the Islamic slave trade? Slavery has never been endorsed or justified by Islam. The mere suggestion is hate speech.//
yeah like Christ didnt rise on the Third Day
abd allah - o go OK abdu llahi
dont mean slave of God - yeah right.
we do realise that there were slaves in the New Testament as well innit?
yeah like Christ didnt rise on the Third Day
abd allah - o go OK abdu llahi
dont mean slave of God - yeah right.
we do realise that there were slaves in the New Testament as well innit?
// Moroccan Sultans bought and sold white people like they were trinkets. //
yeah foo ! to quote Nigh - the Count of Monte Cristo buys the slave Haydee in order to compromise the betrayal of le comte de Mondego - in the Count of Monte Cristo and that is nineteenth century
Nice post - make a change from the usual thin gruel dredged from someones O level essays
yeah foo ! to quote Nigh - the Count of Monte Cristo buys the slave Haydee in order to compromise the betrayal of le comte de Mondego - in the Count of Monte Cristo and that is nineteenth century
Nice post - make a change from the usual thin gruel dredged from someones O level essays
//we do realise that there were slaves in the New Testament as well innit?//
Are you trying to make a serious point, Pet?
And, if so, what is it?
Do you have a comment based on fact rather than Common Purpose agitprop? E.g. the legal probitions of slavery in Mauretania (three at least in the late 20th century - abolitionist zeal which exceeds Wilberforce'), or when it was "abolished" in Niger, or even when and why it was "abolished in Saudi Arabia? Do you have a comment about Sudan and Dafur? Do I need to carry on?)
Are you trying to make a serious point, Pet?
And, if so, what is it?
Do you have a comment based on fact rather than Common Purpose agitprop? E.g. the legal probitions of slavery in Mauretania (three at least in the late 20th century - abolitionist zeal which exceeds Wilberforce'), or when it was "abolished" in Niger, or even when and why it was "abolished in Saudi Arabia? Do you have a comment about Sudan and Dafur? Do I need to carry on?)
ve---Hate speech?? You really need to brush up on your European history. Although Islam prohibited the enslaving of Muslims they went out and kidnapped the highly prized white Europeans from all over the world. The people in Devon and Cornwall in the early 1600s lived in constant fear of the marauding pirates.
In fact one of my own ancestors was kidnapped, taken to Morocco and enslaved for many years. There was no hate speech at all in my post.
In fact one of my own ancestors was kidnapped, taken to Morocco and enslaved for many years. There was no hate speech at all in my post.
//the difference was how different people treated them//
I prefer to think it's about the time when we (the "society") realised it was wrong, Theland.
The abolitionist movement in the early 19th century effectively renounced the Old Testament endorsement of slavery, and the New Testament's passive acceptance.
This latititude is not allowed to any Islamic scholar. The "perfect" man traded in slaves. He (the "perfect" man) reconciled two contrary notions: firstly he said that the manumission of slaves was a pious act and in some cases expiatory of sin.
On the other hand, should he choose not to free the slave, then he's free to have sex with her however young she is. And that too is a pious act.
Contradict that statement at your peril.
I prefer to think it's about the time when we (the "society") realised it was wrong, Theland.
The abolitionist movement in the early 19th century effectively renounced the Old Testament endorsement of slavery, and the New Testament's passive acceptance.
This latititude is not allowed to any Islamic scholar. The "perfect" man traded in slaves. He (the "perfect" man) reconciled two contrary notions: firstly he said that the manumission of slaves was a pious act and in some cases expiatory of sin.
On the other hand, should he choose not to free the slave, then he's free to have sex with her however young she is. And that too is a pious act.
Contradict that statement at your peril.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.