Donate SIGN UP

100 Genders Anyone?

Avatar Image
Togo | 12:47 Sat 14th Sep 2019 | News
59 Answers
You did read that correctly.......The Beep Beep See is now offering the choice of 100 different gender identities....Crikey fakebook only offers a choice of 71. Now I think we all know males have and we know what women have.......what does the Beep Beep See think the other 98 have? Here we go looby loo.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7440377/BBC-education-film-claims-100-gender-identities-blasted-nonsense.html
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 59rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Avatar Image
In my experience they never have differed until some wanted to claim they were a different sex and could be fully that sex if they lived as it and/or had an operation to physically mimic it. Like many words today, it seems some are trying to change meaning to suit their own agenda. If they want to discuss mental issues regarding not feeling the sex that they are...
13:36 Sat 14th Sep 2019
He may have coined it, mamya, although I'm sure it was well before that. Even in Latin, they used masculine, feminine and neuter genders. Nothing to do with sex. So it is older than the hills really.
I'm sure it is as old as mankind really.
In my experience they never have differed until some wanted to claim they were a different sex and could be fully that sex if they lived as it and/or had an operation to physically mimic it. Like many words today, it seems some are trying to change meaning to suit their own agenda. If they want to discuss mental issues regarding not feeling the sex that they are they should find new language to describe it, not claim it's always meant that which they claim it means.
If he introduced it then, then he failed to get the public, who are the arbitrators of language, to agree with him. Should let it go and start a new set of words for mismatches of mental and physical. In any case folk can feel however they feel. The new concept isn't that useful as this 100 gender thing indicates. Maybe best to just drop it altogether and speak sense instead.
Yes- but the other way around, og. Those two words have always meant different things and different concepts. I did this in Psychology in 1995ish- and obviously it was nothing new then.
More recently, people have started using the word "gender" when they mean sex- and I can remember noticing it, it really was quite recent. And that seems to have confused an awful lot of people since. Look at any of these kind of threads, and a lot of people say one, meaning the other. That is confusion, because it is a mistake. Surely making things clear and accurate is the way forward...?
Out of interest, og... if we start pretending sex and gender are the same thing... how would that make things better instead of worse? The biggest problem is that people assume they should be the same, which is quite irrational, but the language now used, encourages it.
100?

It is a total nonsense. Anybody with even a modicum of common sense will (should) dismiss this pandering ridiculousness for the absurdity that it is.
Another confused between sex and gender.... you lot are hard work.
DD, we all know there are only two sexes, I don't think that is even a debate- and obviously can't change between them.
Gender is about which stereotypes you like to follow... which is infinite possibilities, surely?
Perlease!
TTT, you are agreeing with me. Your post at 14:02 was bang on correct- and if it doesn't get best answer... I give up on the human race entirely lol.
I have to go to work now, but will come back after and have a go at you all ;-)
She means it too.
Yup :-) later xxx
Question Author
I see that we have a defence for this nonsense that hinges on the, now well developed, sophism technique adopted by the social manipulators. Was this not predicted in Orwells 1984? Answer... Yes. The globalists and marxist 5th column are fully attuned to the concept that almost anything is possible if one has the power to change the definition of words, for them all truth is relative. Liberal ideologues redefine words to help advance a religious, political, environmental, scientific or social agenda.

"Truth is mighty and will prevail. There is nothing the matter with this, except that it ain't so." — Mark Twain
Pixie - it is abundantly clear that if you're pandering to the idea there's 100 genders that you're incredibly confused. Take a moment and think about it. It ain't hard to realise it's nonsense.

Tonight Matthew, I'm identifying as a Pink Smeg Fridge. And everybody should respect my right to do so and take it seriously.

Bonkers.
Question Author
//Take a moment and think about it. It ain't hard to realise it's nonsense.//

Exactly. If it is true then every living person on Earth can choose a singular gender......thereby destroying the fashionable, for now and used constantly, programme to deride individual thought of any sort. They can't have it both ways.........well unless.(fill in the rest yourselves)
^^^In a way I kind of 'get' the yearning need for people like Pixie to accept this sort of absurdity, because it makes them feel all warm and fluffy, but it simply doesn't detract from the fact that the notion there's 100 genders is, simply, bananas.
My wife says I should identify as a haemorrhoid as I’m a pain in the ***.
Oh dear... lol. There is nothing "pandering" about it DD. There are only 2 sexes. That's it. Nobody can ever change from one to the other. If you have a Y chromosome, you are male and always will be.
Personalities are different... naturally. That does not, in any way, mean a male can become a female or vice versa. I can't help you all with your ability to read... but the "pandering" is allowing one sex to pretend to be the other. Completely wrong. It is not me who is confused, David...
/anything is possible if one has the power to change the definition of words, for them all truth is relative//


The point about Cassandra was not that she wanted to be proved right, but that the catastrophe she predicted could be averted if only people believed her.

The point Orwell was making was that fascist ideologues could corrupt a populace by the manipulation of language. And don't let it happen here.

But it has.
It is, ve. No idea what the rest of your post was about... but Togo, TTT, David small, desk diary and OG... have all totally agreed with me. They all believe they haven't though... purely because they don't understand the English words. It is... bizarre.

21 to 40 of 59rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

100 Genders Anyone?

Answer Question >>