Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
School Kids To Strike For The 5Th Time Of Friday
The debate on Jeremy Vine is
Should the voting age be lowered to 16 as these young people are the future of the planet
They can join the army
They can get married
But are they well equipped to know exactly what there voting for?
Should the voting age be lowered to 16 as these young people are the future of the planet
They can join the army
They can get married
But are they well equipped to know exactly what there voting for?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes... you did make a very good point about maturity. I am always willing to change my mind when convinced otherwise. And you are correct... females mature much earlier than males in every way. Maybe it would make more sense to let them vote at a younger age... after all, it would be very sexist to prevent them, just because the boys haven't caught up yet.
Very interesting, thank you spath xx
Very interesting, thank you spath xx
The voting age is entirely arbitrary, and does take into account how knowledgeable or clever a person is. If it did, half the nation would be disqualified from voting.
And it is not about maturity. Age is not a guarantee of wisdom. Some people are just stupid, and the years between their 18th Birthday and their 70th Birthday will not alter that.
Some of the arguments against lowering the age on this thread are extremely disingenuous. As if most 16 year olds are not fully formed humans yet.
We are debating this now because one side believes a change (or not) will be an advantage to one side or other. So the debate unfortunately goes down those lines. Conservatives are against it because they fear 16 year olds will favour more left wing views. And lefties are in favour of it because that is probably true. But it is not really the basis for an informed argument. We all know that pensioners tend to be more conservative voting, but that is no basis for saying the voting age should be capped at 60, and anyone above that age disenfranchised.
Probably best though, to leave it as it is.
And it is not about maturity. Age is not a guarantee of wisdom. Some people are just stupid, and the years between their 18th Birthday and their 70th Birthday will not alter that.
Some of the arguments against lowering the age on this thread are extremely disingenuous. As if most 16 year olds are not fully formed humans yet.
We are debating this now because one side believes a change (or not) will be an advantage to one side or other. So the debate unfortunately goes down those lines. Conservatives are against it because they fear 16 year olds will favour more left wing views. And lefties are in favour of it because that is probably true. But it is not really the basis for an informed argument. We all know that pensioners tend to be more conservative voting, but that is no basis for saying the voting age should be capped at 60, and anyone above that age disenfranchised.
Probably best though, to leave it as it is.
Folk in England can leave school aged sixteen.
"You can leave school on the last Friday in June if you’ll be 16 by the end of the summer holidays.
You must then do one of the following until you’re 18:
"•stay in full-time education, for example at a collegestart an apprenticeship
•or traineeshipspend 20 hours or more a week working
•or volunteering, while in part-time education or training"
"You can leave school on the last Friday in June if you’ll be 16 by the end of the summer holidays.
You must then do one of the following until you’re 18:
"•stay in full-time education, for example at a collegestart an apprenticeship
•or traineeshipspend 20 hours or more a week working
•or volunteering, while in part-time education or training"
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.