ChatterBank5 mins ago
Prorogation Ruled To Be Unlawful
383 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by THECORBYLOON. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
If Judges come to the wrong conclusion, interested parties can then challenge that by way of the appeal process and if need be, Government can amend legislation to prevent further similar challenges.
A few years ago, the Court of Appeal ruled on an appeal about sanctions given to Jobseekers on the Work Programme scheme.
It ruled the Regulations were invalid because the letters telling claimants to attend appointments did not explain fully, their obligations and the consequences of failing to attend.
The government then rushed through retrospective legislation to cover future sanctions.
It changed the law from a past period so that even the letters previously found to be unlawful, were then lawful and sanctions could be imposed.
A few years ago, the Court of Appeal ruled on an appeal about sanctions given to Jobseekers on the Work Programme scheme.
It ruled the Regulations were invalid because the letters telling claimants to attend appointments did not explain fully, their obligations and the consequences of failing to attend.
The government then rushed through retrospective legislation to cover future sanctions.
It changed the law from a past period so that even the letters previously found to be unlawful, were then lawful and sanctions could be imposed.
"Can the government appeal to the European court? - Anon
No, even if it wanted to, it couldn't.
The European Court of Justice only rules on issues relating to the interpretation of EU law and disputes between member states. Because this is a domestic constitutional issue, the European court has no jurisdiction.
As such, the government has no further opportunities to appeal against the decision, as the Supreme Court is the highest in the UK."
No, even if it wanted to, it couldn't.
The European Court of Justice only rules on issues relating to the interpretation of EU law and disputes between member states. Because this is a domestic constitutional issue, the European court has no jurisdiction.
As such, the government has no further opportunities to appeal against the decision, as the Supreme Court is the highest in the UK."
//What preference? The Court stated several times in its judgement that this is nothing to do with what they think on Brexit,//
Do any of you believe them? Methinks they do protest too much. They want you to believe their reasons, whilst they reserve the right to not believe the Governments reasons. Used to be called a stitch up. Boris.......you've been framed.
Do any of you believe them? Methinks they do protest too much. They want you to believe their reasons, whilst they reserve the right to not believe the Governments reasons. Used to be called a stitch up. Boris.......you've been framed.
//The problem is no one believed Johnson as to his reasons for prorogation.//
There is now an even bigger "problem". No one believes the S.C. either, not even their supporters, and we can't get rid of them but by one method. This "ruling"will have bigger ramifications than stopping the House of Commotions circus for a few days.
There is now an even bigger "problem". No one believes the S.C. either, not even their supporters, and we can't get rid of them but by one method. This "ruling"will have bigger ramifications than stopping the House of Commotions circus for a few days.
So we can't trust Parliament to implement the democratic vote of the populace and now we can't trust the judiciary. All judges from now on must be appointed with their political affiliations known - justice can no longer be held to be blind - or just i.m.o.. If they want to drive the people to violent revolution, all I can say is that they are going the right way about it. I despair.
These are the same Judges that folk were saying would reject the cases and decide in favour of the Government.
Now all of a sudden, toys are being thrown out the prams and the Judges' independence and impartiality are being called into question.
The judgement was 11-0 against the Government, get a grip!
Now all of a sudden, toys are being thrown out the prams and the Judges' independence and impartiality are being called into question.
The judgement was 11-0 against the Government, get a grip!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.