Crosswords3 mins ago
Romanian Gang Are Jailed For Repeatedly Raping 12 Year Old Schoolgirl.
50 Answers
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-7 497917/ Romania n-gang- jailed- 25-year s-repea tedly-r aping-g irl.htm l
/// 'We briefed councillors in advance in case any of their constituents raised issues with them.
'We have put measures in place to ensure there is no backlash against those communities.
'These are four individuals that have committed these crimes - they are not representative of their wider community - they are four individuals within that community.' ///
Yes we must do everything within our power to stop the indigenous population of this land from criticising or blaming those who have chosen to settle in our once great land.
/// 'We briefed councillors in advance in case any of their constituents raised issues with them.
'We have put measures in place to ensure there is no backlash against those communities.
'These are four individuals that have committed these crimes - they are not representative of their wider community - they are four individuals within that community.' ///
Yes we must do everything within our power to stop the indigenous population of this land from criticising or blaming those who have chosen to settle in our once great land.
Answers
I think the point being put forward is that these sorts of crimes seem to be more prevalent from certain cultures/ nations, and so the acts reflect on them. I've no idea if that is just the impression or reality, but it's worth investigatin g. Maybe profiling based on culture is not as bad as made out, even if unfair to individuals.
10:32 Tue 24th Sep 2019
AOG - It is utterly unreasonable to blame an entire race of people because some of their number have committed an appalling crime, or to infer that they are not entitled to the same protection from vigilantism as anyone else.
Allowing boneheads to take the law into their own hands means paediatricians are attacked for the crimes of paedophiles.
Allowing boneheads to take the law into their own hands means paediatricians are attacked for the crimes of paedophiles.
"Allowing boneheads to take the law into their own hands means paediatricians are attacked for the crimes of paedophiles." I can only find one instance of that being reported...a singular instance...not a plurality of cases: https:/ /www.te legraph .co.uk/ news/uk news/13 53904/P aediatr ician-a ttack-P eople-d ont-wan t-no-pa edophil es-here .html
sanmac - // "Allowing boneheads to take the law into their own hands means paediatricians are attacked for the crimes of paedophiles." I can only find one instance of that being reported...a singular instance...not a plurality of cases: https:/ /www.te legraph .co.uk/ news/uk news/13 53904/P aediatr ician-a ttack-P eople-d ont-wan t-no-pa edophil es-here .html22 : //
Being able to find only one example of the extreme end of vigilante ignorance does not negate the point I am making.
As far as I can see, one case of such ignorant self-righteousness is still one case too many.
Being able to find only one example of the extreme end of vigilante ignorance does not negate the point I am making.
As far as I can see, one case of such ignorant self-righteousness is still one case too many.
"...paediatricians are attacked for the crimes of paedophiles." You placed an "s" at the end of each noun; that indicates more than one instance, which of course you did to make your comment much more dramatic and sensational. However, I do agree that one case is too many...But keep in mind that up until now it is only one case.
sanmac - // You placed an "s" at the end of each noun; that indicates more than one instance … //
No, in indicates a generic circumstance, and is non-specific as an illustration of a point being made.
// … which of course you did to make your comment much more dramatic and sensational. //
As the writer of the post, allow me the privilege of knowing my motives better than you, I did not do anything of the kind, that is your imagination, not my post.
// However, I do agree that one case is too many...But keep in mind that up until now it is only one case. //
Make your mind up - "either it is only one case", and therefore not statistically relevant, or it is "one case too many" which renders it utterly unacceptable - you can't have it both ways.
No, in indicates a generic circumstance, and is non-specific as an illustration of a point being made.
// … which of course you did to make your comment much more dramatic and sensational. //
As the writer of the post, allow me the privilege of knowing my motives better than you, I did not do anything of the kind, that is your imagination, not my post.
// However, I do agree that one case is too many...But keep in mind that up until now it is only one case. //
Make your mind up - "either it is only one case", and therefore not statistically relevant, or it is "one case too many" which renders it utterly unacceptable - you can't have it both ways.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.