So, you've turned up at the airport after booking a luxury trip somewhere and 'one of these' is a connecting flight and its the only one for 3 days......
Is the average punter turning up at the airport for their yearly hol to Torremolinos , going to know what the model of the plane is ( or can be bothered to check ) ?
If i was a regular jet-setter, i'd certainly take a flight on board. If they're fixed, then they're fixed. You'd certainly drive your car again if it had been in the garage to have failed brakes or wonky steering fixed, wouldn't you?
If you read the full report, it seems it was a mixture of pilot error and a fault found in the cockpit of the Lionair flight that was not explained fully and therefore wasn’t fixed properly.
//I think the plane has stability problems which may not be adequately corrected by computers (or pilots) taking over control. //
a "max" without MCAS would be perfectly flyable, it just handles differently and would therefore require a different training regime, and a separate airworthiness type certificate. Boeing didn't want that. the MCAS was intended to make the Max behave like a standard 737 and so save Boeing a shedload of cash on training, type certificates, etc etc.
Crashing into a brick wall @ 60 mph or falling 40 thousand feet in a plane before crashing. Both would very probably result in the same outcome - death. You've gotta go sometime:-/