ChatterBank3 mins ago
Should The Senior Officers Of The London Fire Brigade Be Prosecuted?
213 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I haven't read through all the responses properly but a couple stick out - Spath - in some circumstances it is safer for the residents to stay put whilst the FS discovered what they were doing.
That is standard practice as it is in our government office in the event of fire or bomb warnings - mass panic can make things worse.
That is standard practice as it is in our government office in the event of fire or bomb warnings - mass panic can make things worse.
//I can't imagine there being a fire going on around a building and people telling someone to stay put. Makes zero sense whatever information they were given.
If a building is on fire, you get out. Basic knowledge.//
//Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that people should be evacuated.//
Yes spathi, basic knowledge which you have but which fire services across the country (and in the wider world) sadly lack. Not for the first time you speak before engaging brain or doing some research. The idea of staying put in a building such as Grenfell is that the buildings are (or should be) designed to contain the fire in a small area. It’s called “compartmentalisation”. Sadly the theory didn’t work in Grenfell because of the cladding. Research says that it is safer for people to stay put as the risk of injury or death is (normally) greater if they don’t.
//That's what happens when you blindly follow authoritarian figures.
Always do what you personally think is best.//
What is it that you have with “authoritarian figures”? It wasn’t authoritarian figures that told the LFB to adopt the “stay put” strategy. It was their working practices based on experience and research. By the time it was realised that the situation did not fit that model (because of the combustible cladding) the situation had already deteriorated seriously. It’s easy to sit back and say “this should have been done” and “that shouldn’t have happened”. It happens all the time. Scribes sit in the comfort of a cosy office many months later and pontificate on how things should have been done without having the first clue about the problems faced at the time. This idea of seeking prosecutions against people who simply made a wrong decision in the heat (pardon the pun, no joke intended – particularly in this case) of the moment is ridiculous. All people make bad decisions (except those that shy away from making any) but it doesn’t make them criminals when those decisions lead to tragedy.
//I've actually had training on such topics, so no it's not nonsense. It's common sense. Something that lacks here//
Yes please do elaborate so that we can all learn. How much training have you had in extinguishing major fires in and rescuing people from blazing twenty story blocks of flats?
The rest of your ramblings are utter drivel hardly worth a response. And it seems I’m not the only one with that opinion:
//This thread though does at least illustrate how easy it is for normal, rational people to be pushed to breaking point by the hard of thinking and their inability/unwillingness to think things through before spewing their drivel.//
If a building is on fire, you get out. Basic knowledge.//
//Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that people should be evacuated.//
Yes spathi, basic knowledge which you have but which fire services across the country (and in the wider world) sadly lack. Not for the first time you speak before engaging brain or doing some research. The idea of staying put in a building such as Grenfell is that the buildings are (or should be) designed to contain the fire in a small area. It’s called “compartmentalisation”. Sadly the theory didn’t work in Grenfell because of the cladding. Research says that it is safer for people to stay put as the risk of injury or death is (normally) greater if they don’t.
//That's what happens when you blindly follow authoritarian figures.
Always do what you personally think is best.//
What is it that you have with “authoritarian figures”? It wasn’t authoritarian figures that told the LFB to adopt the “stay put” strategy. It was their working practices based on experience and research. By the time it was realised that the situation did not fit that model (because of the combustible cladding) the situation had already deteriorated seriously. It’s easy to sit back and say “this should have been done” and “that shouldn’t have happened”. It happens all the time. Scribes sit in the comfort of a cosy office many months later and pontificate on how things should have been done without having the first clue about the problems faced at the time. This idea of seeking prosecutions against people who simply made a wrong decision in the heat (pardon the pun, no joke intended – particularly in this case) of the moment is ridiculous. All people make bad decisions (except those that shy away from making any) but it doesn’t make them criminals when those decisions lead to tragedy.
//I've actually had training on such topics, so no it's not nonsense. It's common sense. Something that lacks here//
Yes please do elaborate so that we can all learn. How much training have you had in extinguishing major fires in and rescuing people from blazing twenty story blocks of flats?
The rest of your ramblings are utter drivel hardly worth a response. And it seems I’m not the only one with that opinion:
//This thread though does at least illustrate how easy it is for normal, rational people to be pushed to breaking point by the hard of thinking and their inability/unwillingness to think things through before spewing their drivel.//
I haven’t read all the answers but I was listening to a fireman on the radio yesterday who said that rather than direct people into the danger of smoke-filled stair wells, they are told to stay put. Under normal circumstances that is sensible advice. Sadly, at that time, the fire crews didn’t realise that this wasn't normal circumstances. How could they? A tragedy in more ways than one.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.