ChatterBank3 mins ago
Prince Andrew Or Virginia Roberts - Who Do You Believe?
She says he had sex with her three times, he says he’s never even met her....though there is a famous photo showing them together. None of us were present (I assume) but which of them does your instinct tell you is speaking the truth and which is lying? My instinct believes Ms Roberts
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by thesshhh. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Interesting article published a few weeks back in the Huffington Post.
https:/ /www.hu ffingto npost.c o.uk/en try/pri nce-and rew-and -jeffre y-epste in-docu mentary _uk_5da d9103e4 b08cfcc 31ecdbd
Scroll down to just above the solo photograph of the forgetful Prince and read what is said by a former Commander in the Metropolitan Police, and in charge of a Royal Protection Unit. He is at a loss to understand why the Met dropped enquiries in 2015.
Further down the page is a photograph of ex Cabinet Minister Peter Mandelson in company with Epstein.
Wonder if Andy will now help the Police with re-opened matters.
Hans.
https:/
Scroll down to just above the solo photograph of the forgetful Prince and read what is said by a former Commander in the Metropolitan Police, and in charge of a Royal Protection Unit. He is at a loss to understand why the Met dropped enquiries in 2015.
Further down the page is a photograph of ex Cabinet Minister Peter Mandelson in company with Epstein.
Wonder if Andy will now help the Police with re-opened matters.
Hans.
NellieMay - // … and I can't understand this being so newsworthy. //
I can.
Apart from the continual global obsession with the Royal Family, this boorish idle arrogant oaf is financed from the public purse.
His failure to understand that friendship with a convicted paedophile is not a good idea is not a matter for him as a Prince, it's a matter for him as a human being, albeit one without brains, or judgement, or the ability to stay out of trouble.
The fact that he rocks up on national television and tells us he 'Let the side down ...' as though he is a Sunday morning footballer who missed a penalty, shows how seriously out of touch with the real world he is.
The fact that the real world has laws, and the dispensers of those laws will have some tall questions for him, is something he is hoping to squirm out of, and because he is a prince, he probably will.
The man is an amoral repugnant leech, he should be taken off the Royal List today.
I can.
Apart from the continual global obsession with the Royal Family, this boorish idle arrogant oaf is financed from the public purse.
His failure to understand that friendship with a convicted paedophile is not a good idea is not a matter for him as a Prince, it's a matter for him as a human being, albeit one without brains, or judgement, or the ability to stay out of trouble.
The fact that he rocks up on national television and tells us he 'Let the side down ...' as though he is a Sunday morning footballer who missed a penalty, shows how seriously out of touch with the real world he is.
The fact that the real world has laws, and the dispensers of those laws will have some tall questions for him, is something he is hoping to squirm out of, and because he is a prince, he probably will.
The man is an amoral repugnant leech, he should be taken off the Royal List today.
"Jim, I think 18 is the usual age of consent in the US"
It various from state to state, but is generally 16:
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Ages_ of_cons ent_in_ the_Uni ted_Sta tes#Sum mary
I must admit I'm struggling to find the slightest interest in this. The royal family are a total anachronism and the sooner they're abolished the better. It is of supreme irrelevance to me what they do.
All it says to me is that a young woman had sex with a fabulously wealthy older man. That hardly ever happens, right?
It various from state to state, but is generally 16:
https:/
I must admit I'm struggling to find the slightest interest in this. The royal family are a total anachronism and the sooner they're abolished the better. It is of supreme irrelevance to me what they do.
All it says to me is that a young woman had sex with a fabulously wealthy older man. That hardly ever happens, right?
I really couldn’t care less about any of the royal family, and never watch or read anything about them (even though I currently live a 3 minute drive away from one of Her Maj’s many residencies).
I did see the piece of the interview that was shown last night, though, and I can’t help thinking when he said “I kick myself on a daily basis” through 'laughter', was a tad dodgy.
Embarrassed laughter or covering up a lie laughter?
I did see the piece of the interview that was shown last night, though, and I can’t help thinking when he said “I kick myself on a daily basis” through 'laughter', was a tad dodgy.
Embarrassed laughter or covering up a lie laughter?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.