Donate SIGN UP

Is This Justice For Jodie Chesney

Avatar Image
emmie | 18:36 Mon 18th Nov 2019 | News
46 Answers
personally i don't think it is. I would like to see full life terms in prison for crimes of this nature.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-50452136
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 46rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by emmie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
Svenson Ong-a-Kwie, 19, and Arron Isaacs, 17, of Barking, were both convicted earlier this month after a trial at the Old Bailey.

Ong-a-Kwie, of Romford, will serve a minimum of 26 years while Isaacs was detained for at least 18 years.
"Minimums" are something... they can't be released earlier. I'm not sure anything will really be "justice" for her.
Question Author
pixie perhaps not, but life term should be the case in this. It wont bring her back but the family get some justice
I passionately support the return of the death penalty for cases like this. The girl they murdered wasn't even their intended victim - she just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Every chance they'll serve longer, hopefully.
They may well end up there for life. I hope so.
Question Author
i know the death penalty won't return to these shores, but there are times when i wish it would, then i get my head straight and know that it's not a deterrent.
"Every chance they'll serve longer, hopefully."

I think that is unlikely unless they are convicted of further offences whilst in prison.

25 years minimum is the start point for murder with a weapon with leeway up or down. I think the sentences are correct but obviously wan't satisfy everyone.
Question Author
dave
it won't and doesn't satisfy me and lots more besides.
they are barbarians and should not see the light of day
No Dave, the theory is that that is the earliest they can be reassessed. Even if they commit no further crimes in prison, they have to be safe to be released or they stay in.
I said unlikely - not impossible!
You have more faith in them than I do, maybe...
damn savages should never see the light of day again.
Nothing less than the death penalty. They do not deserve to live let alone be released in later years to live out their lives.
Quite Frankly I would like to see these low life worthless thugs be publicly hanged in the same park they cowardly slaughtered this poor young girl. Just let their gangster followers watch their heroes be led up the scaffold pleading for their Mums and urinating in their pants as the noose is placed round their neck. Please don't tell us we live in a civilised society. What is civilised about this scum.?
Perhaps the buddies of this scum might have second thoughts when they see their heroes not quite so heroic. 'Pour encourager les autres'
Question Author
they will get out and still be old enough to have some life, wrong on every level..
They may.... if they can prove they are safe enough. Or they may not. I'm not suggesting they should be ever allowed out, but there are no guarantees here that they ever will be. Which is probably as much as we can hope for nowadays. I think full-life terms are very rare.
Question Author
bit like the couple recently the step brother and sister who killed two of their children, i think they should just rot in prison.
I’m with retro on this. I wouldn’t mind the job of carp disposal.
Question Author
life term is more my way of thinking to be honest.

1 to 20 of 46rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is This Justice For Jodie Chesney

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.