Should Trident Be Scrapped

emmie | 13:13 Sun 24th Nov 2019 | News

64 Answers

as proposed by the SNP.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50536460

Man Arrested Over Anti-Semitic Abuse On Tube

Above And Beyond The Call Of Duty

Answers

1 to 20 of 64

1 2 3 4 Next Last

webbo3

Best Answer

maggiebee. \\Definitely YES. Very expensive and Scotland is fed up of being the dumping ground of the UK.// I take it you want job loses and a loss to the local economy the. https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/union-warn-of-job-losses-if-trident-and-submarines-moved-from-scotland/ \\However, GMB union warned that removing nuclear weapons and...

13:39 Sun 24th Nov 2019

Go To Best Answer

dannyk13

No, it is a deterrent and should be retained.

emmie

Question Author

Labour would have to commit to scrap Trident to gain the SNP's support in the event of a Labour minority government, Nicola Sturgeon has said.

emmie

Question Author

but it's cost is enormous, wouldn't you agree.

Zacs-Master

The SNP’s leader should be scrapped.

maggiebee

Definitely YES. Very expensive and Scotland is fed up of being the dumping ground of the UK.

JimF

Yes. Trident exists as a so-called deterrent to other nuclear powers attacking through "Mutually Assured Destruction", or MAD - the acronym is apposite. It is ridiculously expensive, and the idea that the Russians (or whoever) would nuke Scotland / rUK if Trident were abandoned is about as loony as it gets.

naomi24

I agree with danny - and Zacs.

JimF

Just couldn't resist, could you Zacs!

naomi24

//Scotland is fed up of being the dumping ground of the UK. //

Pity the rest of the UK doesn't stop dumping a significant amount of money in Scotland then.

maggiebee

Same old, same old Naomi, you really need to look at the figures.

Zacs-Master

What jim, speaking the truth. Yeah, it’s a big fault of mine.

naomi24

I've looked.

emmie

Question Author

its certainly a lot of dosh.

https://fullfact.org/economy/trident-nuclear-cost/

naomi24

^That to maggiebee.

emmie

Question Author

i agree that its a lot money, couldn't they upgrade the ones we have now, a lot less money, and the surplus could go to worthier causes.....

dannyk13

emmie//but it's cost is enormous.//
The cost of keeping the peace.

NellieMay

No. The cost is enormous, but it's essential to maintain our deterrent. There are some dangerous countries in this world who wouldn't hesitate to use nuclear weapons if we didn't have the means to hit back. Really sad though.

ToraToraTora

anyway, it's cheap, compared to Jezza's plans it's a drop in the ocean.

emmie

Question Author

i can see why we have them. A deterrent yes..

1 to 20 of 64

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?