ChatterBank3 mins ago
Who Would Object To Deporting Lowlife Criminal Scum?
34 Answers
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/p m-under -pressu re-to-s top-dep ortatio n-of-50 -crimin als-to- jamaica -119269 72
Yep, you guessed it! Labour of course!
Yep, you guessed it! Labour of course!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It relates to the Joint Enterprise legislation.
https:/ /www.go ogle.co m/amp/s /amp.th eguardi an.com/ law/201 6/feb/1 8/joint -enterp rise-la w-wrong ly-inte rpreted -for-30 -years- court-r ules
https:/
This is what Dawn Butler said in Parliament.
"On a point of order, Mr Speaker. The Home Office press team told journalists that all the people on a deportation flight to Jamaica were serious criminals. That seems not to have been true, and, as my hon. Friend the Member for Nottingham East (Nadia Whittome) said earlier, the Government have not even received the lessons learned report.
The wife of a constituent of mine has said that he is due to be deported in just six days’ time. He was convicted under the now unlawful joint enterprise rule, and was released after two months. His wife fears that this stress will kill him because he has a heart problem. Mr Speaker, how can I get the Home Secretary to take this seriously and to be truthful about the people who are due to be on the deportation flight, so that we can halt it until we establish the true facts of the situation?"
She is not claiming that there are none who should be deported. She has asked that one specific case be looked at and that is a completely different matter.
"On a point of order, Mr Speaker. The Home Office press team told journalists that all the people on a deportation flight to Jamaica were serious criminals. That seems not to have been true, and, as my hon. Friend the Member for Nottingham East (Nadia Whittome) said earlier, the Government have not even received the lessons learned report.
The wife of a constituent of mine has said that he is due to be deported in just six days’ time. He was convicted under the now unlawful joint enterprise rule, and was released after two months. His wife fears that this stress will kill him because he has a heart problem. Mr Speaker, how can I get the Home Secretary to take this seriously and to be truthful about the people who are due to be on the deportation flight, so that we can halt it until we establish the true facts of the situation?"
She is not claiming that there are none who should be deported. She has asked that one specific case be looked at and that is a completely different matter.
The OP asks, "Who Would Object To Deporting Lowlife Criminal Scum?"
That means that those about to be deported are "Lowlife Criminal Scum". However, if one of them is being deported only because of an offence for which he was gaoled unlawfully, is being described as "Lowlife Criminal Scum" appropriate?
That means that those about to be deported are "Lowlife Criminal Scum". However, if one of them is being deported only because of an offence for which he was gaoled unlawfully, is being described as "Lowlife Criminal Scum" appropriate?
It is remarkably easy to view a situation like this in simple terms - 'Low life scum - deport to country of origin'.
But as is apparent, situations are individual and not as clear cut as may first appear.
I would have no objection to proper checks that all the deportees are guilty of serious offences, and do not belong here, but that's not the same as the 'Shoot 'em all let God sort 'em out' attitude of some of our posters on this thread.
But as is apparent, situations are individual and not as clear cut as may first appear.
I would have no objection to proper checks that all the deportees are guilty of serious offences, and do not belong here, but that's not the same as the 'Shoot 'em all let God sort 'em out' attitude of some of our posters on this thread.
Togo - // Don't forget....they are "all gud lads" who are marvellous to their mams....and kind to animals, but Tommy Robinson is a dangerous criminal and a threat to the safety of all your family and friends. //
Is that nonsense addressed to anyone specifically, or just a general, and inaccurate, observation?
Is that nonsense addressed to anyone specifically, or just a general, and inaccurate, observation?
AH, you don't know who Lord Lonford was? really? Ok I'll play along, he was the guy who tried to get various criminal psychopaths freed, most notably Myra Hindley, who he described as a "very brave woman" and "she is not evil... she is a good woman and there is no reason that she should be in prison."
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.