Power-Mad And Dangerous.

[diddlydo]

Those of you who voted in our PM, please read this and be worried - be very worried.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/13/the-guardian-view-on-the-reshuffle-johnsons-cabinet-of-courtiers

[sevenOP]

\\\\\\\\" That's why they had to go."

Who ???? Name names Spicerack, no 'state' secrets here \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Come on Spicerack, we are waiting to be *genuinely* enlightened.

[Spicerack]

Dom let them in on a false secret. Next day it was in the papers.
Not just traitors but thick as *** to go with it.
Now stop bullying me, 7op. I need a safe space.

[sevenOP]

Spicerack, I am not bullying you. It is a simple question; no use me asking Togo again, he, like many other posters only partake of this Forum on their own terms i.e. will ASK questions and make assertions BUT refuse to answer questions, even though this Forum is called ANSWERBANK.

[Zacs-Master]

The website is called AnswerBank. It's evolution into a forum was tangential to it's original purpose.

[TheDevil]

"We didn't vote for the PM. We voted for the party. The party votes for the PM."

We didn't vote for antisemitism, we voted for the party. The party then allowed antisemitism.

Pfft it's all one and the same APK. If you voted cons knowing Boris was the leader then you're voting for boris.

[TheDevil]

Also, the number of people who didn't vote labour because of Corbyn.. The leader of the partys always come into play when voting for or against.

[Togo]

diddly appears to have disappeared from her own thread. That is unusual, when the taps are turned on it has always been full flow in the past. Any ideas why?

[Zacs-Master]

A sudden realisation of your place in the scheme of things?

[sevenOP]

Yes.

[Togo]

Ever notice how the answer seekers are usually the least receptive to concepts or nuances but also unable to actually accept answers that they find unpalatable. The civil service contains quite a few Law, Policy Delivery, Statistical, and Project Management branches, to name but a few, that were instrumental in attempting to thwart our democratic process.

[Zacs-Master]

Others would argue that they were making sure democratic processes WERE followed.

[Old_Geezer]

Or could it simply be that Boris wants everyone on board to achieve that which was promised ? That he's fed up to the back teeth with the thwarting that occurred prior to the GE and wishes to ensure that there is none, albeit by the risky approach of not hearing alternative views ?

[sevenOP]

In deed, continuity can be problematic, and time dependent.

[theshedman]

sevenop, at 14.45 the person who started this thread very rarely answers questions just stirs things up then disappears. Maybe it's them you need to have a go at but you probably wont get an answer.

[sevenOP]

shedman, I was not 'having a go' at anyone. I was asking specific questions to specific posters, NONE of who were 'the person who started this thread'.

[theshedman]

Sorry about that sevenOP must have misread something. Just read the middle of your post and where you say about people putting stuff on and not answering thought about the person who started this one who has disappeared from it again.

[Togo]

//the person who started this one who has disappeared from it again.//

Not necessarily. (*_^)

[Apc2604]

14.51 TD //Pfft it's all one and the same APK. If you voted cons knowing Boris was the leader then you're voting for boris./

At my age TD do you not think I am aware of that? I voted conservative because of its agenda. If any of the contestants had become PM, I would have voted conservative. There was no other party I would consider voting for in December. (I actually voted for out constituency candidate as we all did!)

But I was glad Boris got the vote of his party.

[Apc2604]

not APK by the way. It's Apc.

[diddlydo]

I've only so much time in my life to argue with you short-sighted idolaters of Boris - that's why I haven't bothered with further comment until now. I repeat - he is power-crazy and dangerous.