Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
And What If They Dont ?...
180 Answers
https:/
Will they be getting down on one knee and asking them in a nice subservient manner to go home, so as not be accused of racism or anything ?....god forbid they dont kow tow to minority demands...
Will they be getting down on one knee and asking them in a nice subservient manner to go home, so as not be accused of racism or anything ?....god forbid they dont kow tow to minority demands...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TheWholeTruth. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
That is a live feed from 'ruptly' who are independent of any news channels or 'establishment' media. Having said that they appear to be allied in some way to Russia.
What I like is they get on the ground amongst the action so you can see what is going on without bias. I watched them last Sat and Sun. I doubt the 'action' will be occurring for a couple of hours yet. The sides will still be forming up and finishing their sarnies etc.
You can see their footage of last weekend on YouTube by searching on 'ruptly london'
What I like is they get on the ground amongst the action so you can see what is going on without bias. I watched them last Sat and Sun. I doubt the 'action' will be occurring for a couple of hours yet. The sides will still be forming up and finishing their sarnies etc.
You can see their footage of last weekend on YouTube by searching on 'ruptly london'
//unfortunately shoota i very much doubt it...//
agreed - but not for the reason you suggest. the risk assessment for the kind of event expected determines that "a brick in the face often offends" - so the modern method of policing is to let them do their worst, then identify the perpetrators from the CCTV and get them afterwards.
agreed - but not for the reason you suggest. the risk assessment for the kind of event expected determines that "a brick in the face often offends" - so the modern method of policing is to let them do their worst, then identify the perpetrators from the CCTV and get them afterwards.
Here is an opinion of a Jamaican posted in the "Jamaica Observer."
"Dear Editor,
I declare that I am a history enthusiast and I join others who hold the view that if you do not know about your past you cannot shape your future.
In the midst of the protests about George Floyd, attention has turned to colonisation, slavery, and racism. There are now calls to remove statues, monuments, and plaques from the public domain and to rename roads, among other things. Some radical voices would incite others to destroy historic buildings, monuments, and infrastructure, suggesting they are symbols of evil.
Jamaica experienced 468 years of colonisation and slavery. Were we to commence changing the names of places and removing monuments, etc, what cost would that be to taxpayers? We would have to start by renaming some of our parishes, Manchester, Trelawny; many of our towns and villages; and a great many of our communities and roads.
We have opened Port Royal to visitors and have been seeking to have it declared a United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Site. A lot of wicked people were there.
We see Falmouth as an important Georgian historic site and tourist destination. A cruise ship pier is there. Should we now bulldoze it, as the people who lived there owned slaves?
Does Spanish Town no longer have any value because it was the seat of the colonial government?
I think we need to take a few deep breaths and engage in a rational discussion about our history and its value. We need more voices in the discussion and greater public awareness. We cannot erase history. It is what was. We emerged from it. It is our story. We should preserve it, learn from it, benefit from it, and write new chapters."
"Dear Editor,
I declare that I am a history enthusiast and I join others who hold the view that if you do not know about your past you cannot shape your future.
In the midst of the protests about George Floyd, attention has turned to colonisation, slavery, and racism. There are now calls to remove statues, monuments, and plaques from the public domain and to rename roads, among other things. Some radical voices would incite others to destroy historic buildings, monuments, and infrastructure, suggesting they are symbols of evil.
Jamaica experienced 468 years of colonisation and slavery. Were we to commence changing the names of places and removing monuments, etc, what cost would that be to taxpayers? We would have to start by renaming some of our parishes, Manchester, Trelawny; many of our towns and villages; and a great many of our communities and roads.
We have opened Port Royal to visitors and have been seeking to have it declared a United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Site. A lot of wicked people were there.
We see Falmouth as an important Georgian historic site and tourist destination. A cruise ship pier is there. Should we now bulldoze it, as the people who lived there owned slaves?
Does Spanish Town no longer have any value because it was the seat of the colonial government?
I think we need to take a few deep breaths and engage in a rational discussion about our history and its value. We need more voices in the discussion and greater public awareness. We cannot erase history. It is what was. We emerged from it. It is our story. We should preserve it, learn from it, benefit from it, and write new chapters."
