ChatterBank7 mins ago
Will Schools Reopen?
76 Answers
much debate in the media about schools and their reopening over the last few days - with the government suggesting children are not super spreaders, countered by Neil Ferguson saying that they are. and along with suggestions by the Association of Schools and College Leaders that children could only attend on a rota basis, is the NEU's 200 point checklist to be satisfied before schools should reopen.
no link - google "schools" in the news tab and then read it in the media that supports your point of view. but the NEU list is not a right-wing media invention, it does exist, here - https:/ /neu.or g.uk/me dia/114 76/view
what chance of the list being satisfied before opening day, or compromises being reached? or will the schools remain closed, or partly closed?
no link - google "schools" in the news tab and then read it in the media that supports your point of view. but the NEU list is not a right-wing media invention, it does exist, here - https:/
what chance of the list being satisfied before opening day, or compromises being reached? or will the schools remain closed, or partly closed?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.A school that I know well worked on a very detailed plan and risk assessment with Unions and the Local Authority prior to the current break so that all children can attend in September. The staff want the children back in school and would not put themselves and the children at risk if they thought it couldn’t be managed.
Ymb
The Government are saying it wants schools to reopen, but they not demonstrating/proving that it is safe to do so. Cases are rising again, now back to over 1000+ daily.
In May when we had 1000+ daily cases the schools were shut on safety grounds. Now we have the exact same figures, and they want to reopen.
The Government are saying it wants schools to reopen, but they not demonstrating/proving that it is safe to do so. Cases are rising again, now back to over 1000+ daily.
In May when we had 1000+ daily cases the schools were shut on safety grounds. Now we have the exact same figures, and they want to reopen.
I thought the figures showed that cases were levelling out after a gradual rise, and despite local “spikes”.
Simply reacting to a single statistic (number of cases) is not helpful.
I don’t care for this government, but how can they “prove” one thing or the other on anything like this. Even scientists don’t agree.
Simply reacting to a single statistic (number of cases) is not helpful.
I don’t care for this government, but how can they “prove” one thing or the other on anything like this. Even scientists don’t agree.
Re the government allegedly not reassuring people, here’s episode 9 million of a long series :-)
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-53718 066
https:/
I fully expect the majority of schools to re-open their doors in September. I also expect to see many (if not most) of them staggering the hours of education allotted to each 'year' in order to make the best use of the size of the building in which each school is housed. There will no doubt be some parents who (despite what the Government say) will be worried about sending their kids back immediately. If their concerns are genuine - a member of the household in very poor health, say - the first course of action should not be to fine these parents but to give them assurances that the return to school is both safe and absolutely necessary.
"Cases are rising again, now back to over 1000+ daily."
More testing and tracing, more cases. And you know that stop twisting stats to prove your nonsense.
" but they not demonstrating/proving that it is safe to do so."
From what I read they have, perhaps open today's paper instead of MArch's. There is now data available from other countries around how children spread/catch it.
Stopping kids from going to school which you seem to be advocating is a disgrace. It will also create even bigger divisions between the Disadvantaged kids and advantaged one. But then, given many of your posts, that probably you agenda so you can should how bad the Government are for making the poor have a bad education.
More testing and tracing, more cases. And you know that stop twisting stats to prove your nonsense.
" but they not demonstrating/proving that it is safe to do so."
From what I read they have, perhaps open today's paper instead of MArch's. There is now data available from other countries around how children spread/catch it.
Stopping kids from going to school which you seem to be advocating is a disgrace. It will also create even bigger divisions between the Disadvantaged kids and advantaged one. But then, given many of your posts, that probably you agenda so you can should how bad the Government are for making the poor have a bad education.
Johnson tried to insist schools would reopen on 1st June, but parents weren’t convinced and it didn’t happen.
https:/ /www.st andard. co.uk/n ews/edu cation/ reopeni ng-scho ols-jun e-go-ah ead-bor is-john son-a44 49706.h tml
Not sure much has changed since then. Where I live children are not allowed their grandma visit their home. Funerals must not have more than 30 mourners, but they want 30+ children to go and sit in a classroom.
As I said earlier, none of it makes sense.
https:/
Not sure much has changed since then. Where I live children are not allowed their grandma visit their home. Funerals must not have more than 30 mourners, but they want 30+ children to go and sit in a classroom.
As I said earlier, none of it makes sense.
Ich
// Government advisers have warned the nation may have reached the limit of what can be reopened in society safely.
But Mr Williamson suggested an upcoming study would support the government's position on reopening schools. //
Yep, that is not at all contradictory. A study that is not out yet isn’t proof of anything. Another mixed message unfortunately.
// Government advisers have warned the nation may have reached the limit of what can be reopened in society safely.
But Mr Williamson suggested an upcoming study would support the government's position on reopening schools. //
Yep, that is not at all contradictory. A study that is not out yet isn’t proof of anything. Another mixed message unfortunately.
“ Funerals must not have more than 30 mourners, but they want 30+ children to go and sit in a classroom. ”
Utterly specious, with respect.
A class typically contains 30 kids max. In fact there had been much talk of reducing or staggering the classes.
So you might just as well say that it’s wrong to allow 30 to attend a funeral and yet stop the other :-)
Utterly specious, with respect.
A class typically contains 30 kids max. In fact there had been much talk of reducing or staggering the classes.
So you might just as well say that it’s wrong to allow 30 to attend a funeral and yet stop the other :-)
Just think what the typical profile age wise of the attendees are at funerals compared to school ckassrooms.
And do people avoid touching at funerals? No they don't. Schools have worked for months to draw up risk assessments and plans - bubbles, one way systems, desks separated. Maybe if churches/funeral providers did the same the 30 figure could be relaxed
And do people avoid touching at funerals? No they don't. Schools have worked for months to draw up risk assessments and plans - bubbles, one way systems, desks separated. Maybe if churches/funeral providers did the same the 30 figure could be relaxed