ChatterBank3 mins ago
Sussexes Pay Back Frogmore Debt...
I notice there's nothing about this as yet. I guess ABers only really care about negative stories about Harry and Meghan.
https:/ /www.et online. com/pri nce-har ry-pays -back-3 1-milli on-spen t-on-fr ogmore- cottage -renova tions-1 52615
https:/
Answers
They've paid back their debt to the taxpayer. Good. It's the right thing to do, although it won't stop the whiners whining about them as I'm sure they're well aware. Now, which of the other royals will be next to cough up I wonder.
22:59 Wed 09th Sep 2020
Mozz - // It just means the Bednobs misread the title of the thread. My comment is a joke on that misread title. //
Bednobs has supplied the answer, but thanks anyway.
// I think you've misunderstood and thought it was a dig. //
I had no idea what it meant, so no, I didn't think it was a dig, I actually had no notion of what it was about!!
Bednobs has supplied the answer, but thanks anyway.
// I think you've misunderstood and thought it was a dig. //
I had no idea what it meant, so no, I didn't think it was a dig, I actually had no notion of what it was about!!
Andy - have you not noticed how many people say the same thing? YOU take threads off track and then ruin threads by copying and pasting their replies to you.
If you want to keep a thread on track reply to someone using their name. You don't need to reply sentence by sentence. If we're not sure which answer you're replying to then we haven't read the whole thread and it's down to us to go back and check.
If you want to keep a thread on track reply to someone using their name. You don't need to reply sentence by sentence. If we're not sure which answer you're replying to then we haven't read the whole thread and it's down to us to go back and check.
ummmm - // Andy - have you not noticed how many people say the same thing? YOU take threads off track and then ruin threads by copying and pasting their replies to you. //
I know there s a hardcore of about three or four who regularly come on to snipe.
What they don't seem to appreciate is the bottomless irony that in coming on to accuse me of de-railing a thread, they are de-railing it themselves.
//If you want to keep a thread on track reply to someone using their name. //
My reply to any post is the person's name - always has been, always will be - check the start of this post for an example, or any post I have made in the last decade, or beyond.
// You don't need to reply sentence by sentence. If we're not sure which answer you're replying to then we haven't read the whole thread and it's down to us to go back and check. //
I would not presume to give anyone lessons in how I think they should present their posts.
Everyone is free to say what they wish how they wish, within Site Rules, and everyone is equally free to ignore posts which they don't like, or even the entire input from posters they don't like.
So why don't you ignore me completely, it will save you cluttering up threads with this sort of nonsense because I won't be obliged to defend myself from your pointless attacks - and that applies to the rest of your cabal as well. I won't miss your pointless sniping, I doubt anyone else will either.
There - we can get on with not de-railing threads with arguments about de-railing - that's much better.
I know there s a hardcore of about three or four who regularly come on to snipe.
What they don't seem to appreciate is the bottomless irony that in coming on to accuse me of de-railing a thread, they are de-railing it themselves.
//If you want to keep a thread on track reply to someone using their name. //
My reply to any post is the person's name - always has been, always will be - check the start of this post for an example, or any post I have made in the last decade, or beyond.
// You don't need to reply sentence by sentence. If we're not sure which answer you're replying to then we haven't read the whole thread and it's down to us to go back and check. //
I would not presume to give anyone lessons in how I think they should present their posts.
Everyone is free to say what they wish how they wish, within Site Rules, and everyone is equally free to ignore posts which they don't like, or even the entire input from posters they don't like.
So why don't you ignore me completely, it will save you cluttering up threads with this sort of nonsense because I won't be obliged to defend myself from your pointless attacks - and that applies to the rest of your cabal as well. I won't miss your pointless sniping, I doubt anyone else will either.
There - we can get on with not de-railing threads with arguments about de-railing - that's much better.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.