Donate SIGN UP

Sussexes Pay Back Frogmore Debt...

Avatar Image
Mozz71 | 21:03 Mon 07th Sep 2020 | News
202 Answers
I notice there's nothing about this as yet. I guess ABers only really care about negative stories about Harry and Meghan.

https://www.etonline.com/prince-harry-pays-back-31-million-spent-on-frogmore-cottage-renovations-152615

Answers

181 to 200 of 202rss feed

First Previous 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last

Avatar Image
They've paid back their debt to the taxpayer. Good. It's the right thing to do, although it won't stop the whiners whining about them as I'm sure they're well aware. Now, which of the other royals will be next to cough up I wonder.
22:59 Wed 09th Sep 2020
a-h as AB's number one Mod is untouchable. Best to avoid.
Question Author
//let's not get off-topic shall we?//

Now, there's some irony.

I think I'm done. It's getting ridiculous, and I'm done banging my head against the wall. Enjoy the thread. Don't be afraid to try and get it back on topic.
lol a masterclass in passive-aggressiveness from certain people!
for avoidance of doubt, I did not mean mozz.
Does anyone else read "pay back fromage debt" everytime this comes up in LP?
Jackdaw - // a-h as AB's number one Mod is untouchable. Best to avoid. //

Grow up.
bednobs - // Does anyone else read "pay back fromage debt" everytime this comes up in LP? //

I have no idea what that means - care to elaborate, since we all seem to be off the OP now?
Question Author
//Does anyone else read "pay back fromage debt" everytime this comes up in LP?//

That explains why she grates on so many people.
Mozz - // //Does anyone else read "pay back fromage debt" everytime this comes up in LP?//

That explains why she grates on so many people. //

If you understand, care to elaborate?
it only means that I keep misreading frogmore (their cottage) to fromage (French for cheese)
And it's annoying me!
a bit like when you see shopfitters written down and misread it to shop lifters
Question Author
It just means the Bednobs misread the title of the thread. My comment is a joke on that misread title.

I think you've misunderstood and thought it was a dig.
Once again I have to step into the breach to explain to the hard of thinking.
'Frogmore' could be misread as 'fromage', meaning that the title reads: The Sussexes have paid their cheese bill.
bednobs - // it only means that I keep misreading frogmore (their cottage) to fromage (French for cheese)
And it's annoying me!
a bit like when you see shopfitters written down and misread it to shop lifters //

Thanks for that - much appreciated.
Mozz - // It just means the Bednobs misread the title of the thread. My comment is a joke on that misread title. //

Bednobs has supplied the answer, but thanks anyway.

// I think you've misunderstood and thought it was a dig. //

I had no idea what it meant, so no, I didn't think it was a dig, I actually had no notion of what it was about!!
Question Author
//The Sussexes have paid their cheese bill.//

You can get a lot of Wensleydale for £2.5m.
Andy - have you not noticed how many people say the same thing? YOU take threads off track and then ruin threads by copying and pasting their replies to you.

If you want to keep a thread on track reply to someone using their name. You don't need to reply sentence by sentence. If we're not sure which answer you're replying to then we haven't read the whole thread and it's down to us to go back and check.
ummmm - // Andy - have you not noticed how many people say the same thing? YOU take threads off track and then ruin threads by copying and pasting their replies to you. //

I know there s a hardcore of about three or four who regularly come on to snipe.

What they don't seem to appreciate is the bottomless irony that in coming on to accuse me of de-railing a thread, they are de-railing it themselves.

//If you want to keep a thread on track reply to someone using their name. //

My reply to any post is the person's name - always has been, always will be - check the start of this post for an example, or any post I have made in the last decade, or beyond.

// You don't need to reply sentence by sentence. If we're not sure which answer you're replying to then we haven't read the whole thread and it's down to us to go back and check. //

I would not presume to give anyone lessons in how I think they should present their posts.

Everyone is free to say what they wish how they wish, within Site Rules, and everyone is equally free to ignore posts which they don't like, or even the entire input from posters they don't like.

So why don't you ignore me completely, it will save you cluttering up threads with this sort of nonsense because I won't be obliged to defend myself from your pointless attacks - and that applies to the rest of your cabal as well. I won't miss your pointless sniping, I doubt anyone else will either.

There - we can get on with not de-railing threads with arguments about de-railing - that's much better.
//So why don't you ignore me completely?\\

Best advice you've ever posted on AB.
Jackdaw - // //So why don't you ignore me completely?\\

Best advice you've ever posted on AB. //

But you are not taking it.

Shame - you are at the top of the list of people that I wish would!!!
Flipping heck! I’ve just come back to this thread and find all this nonsense. I suspect I won’t just be boycotting the Science section in future but any thread that involves AH too. What an absolute disgrace!
naomi - // What an absolute disgrace! //

Yes miss ... no miss ... thank you miss ... sorry miss ...

181 to 200 of 202rss feed

First Previous 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.