Wilson said "Whoever took the picture didn't approach me or say anything to me which I suppose would have been the proper way to behave." *** Inserts rolling on floor, crying with laughter emoji *** Durrr. There's a Coronavirus outbreak hitchhiking itself around the world. You're not wearing a mask and you're on the Tube - people DO NOT speak to strangers on...
Viruses do not produce spores tony, I think you mean the virus itself is much smaller than the holes. Yes, that is well known but we still seem to be hysterical about masks. Curious.
The other day I was watching a reporter doing a piece to camera in a damp atmosphere; you could clearly see her breath and just how far it projected forwards. It's blatantly obvious that a mask would deflect the breath and the virus carried with it. Even if the mask doesn't contain the virus it will, at least, reduce the distance it travels.
It isn’t true that masks are supposed only to protect other people from the wearer - although the supposed benefit is assessed largely to be the other way.
But the law here doesn’t even say you have to wear a mask.
However just to repeat that that isn’t what Mr Wilson was complaining about
It doesn't really matter whether or not we believe face coverings have any real effect on warding off the virus. What matters is that our elected MPs have told us we MUST wear them in certain areas. Then those same MPs are caught not doing so. Then complain about having been caught!
From “best answer”
Answer Wilson said "Whoever took the picture didn't approach me or say anything to me which I suppose would have been the proper way to behave.“
Answer Wilson said "Whoever took the picture didn't approach me or say anything to me which I suppose would have been the proper way to behave.“
The proper way to behave is to set an example and wear the b****y mask.
If it was proven that masks only protected people FROM the wearer then people who have had the virus and are not infectious wouldn’t need to wear them.
Similarly people who were immune would not need protecting. In theory.
But that never gets mentioned. It’s plainly the case that they seem to be more effective for breathing out than breathing in but the truth is no one knows for sure, especially as masks differ so much
ich //who have had the virus and are not infectious wouldn’t need to wear them.//
There is no evidence that a person cannot contract the virus more than once.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.