naomi - // AH, We’re not talking about Charles Manson. //
You asked - what texts? I provided you with a response that backs my point, which is that Charles Manson used the text of Beatles lyrics to 'inspire' is murderous behaviour, and suddenly you decide - "We're not talking about Charles Manson".
It is somewhat discourteous of you to ask for an example, and then dismiss it when you get one - not in the spirit of debate at all.
// You claimed that priests abuse children in the name of God and claimed biblical texts their inspiration. Asked to provide those texts, you can’t. //
Fortunately, being neither a priest or a paedophile, I am not qualified to point out the texts, but I maintain my premise that it is more than reasonable that a priest grooming a victim is going to bring both God and the bible into his persuasion, and I think if you took a reasonable and detached view, you can see that I have a case for my viewpoint.
// I think your purpose in making this utterly ludicrous claim is solely to have a go at Theland and nothing more. //
You are welcome to think what you wish, but of course, although you find trouble with the notion - you thinking something does not automatically make it correct - speaking of which ...
// Ps. If you’ve read the bible I’m a monkey’s uncle - and I’m not. //
It appears that actually, you are, because I have read the bible, and that is for me to know, and you to deny based entirely on your personal prejudices.
But if you want to make a fool of yourself in front of the assembled company with another of your sweeping and unproven statements, and link yourself to a primate family, don't let me stop you.