Motoring0 min ago
A New Political Party?
After Corbyns suspension from the Labour Party,perhaps him and the rest of the anti-semites in the party(fifteen at the last count),could hive off from the non anti-semites and form their own political party.They could call themselver the National Socialist British Workers Party.Go for it,Corby.
Answers
https://
18:54 Sun 01st Nov 2020
I don’t see why not.
Corbyn is clearly a Jew hater, Naz Shah also hates Jews, as does Ken Livingstone, so they’ve got the kernel of a new movement already. Wear a few black shirts sporting swastikas and they’re almost there.
Abbott, the gift that never stops giving, can join them, although in her case she’s so breathtakingly stupid, she’d think a black shirt was a fashion statement; she could also wear odd shoes.
Corbyn is clearly a Jew hater, Naz Shah also hates Jews, as does Ken Livingstone, so they’ve got the kernel of a new movement already. Wear a few black shirts sporting swastikas and they’re almost there.
Abbott, the gift that never stops giving, can join them, although in her case she’s so breathtakingly stupid, she’d think a black shirt was a fashion statement; she could also wear odd shoes.
In your dreams.
They won’t leave because they have a little bit of power while in Labour, rather than none in a new party.
Starmer wants Corbyn to go, which is why he won’t. When the Corbynistas ran the roost, they were threatening to deselect the Blairites. This is Starmer’s tit for tat.
More civil war in the Labour Party when they should be uniting and exploiting a failing Government.
Nothing really changes in that outdated and not fit for purpose Party.
They won’t leave because they have a little bit of power while in Labour, rather than none in a new party.
Starmer wants Corbyn to go, which is why he won’t. When the Corbynistas ran the roost, they were threatening to deselect the Blairites. This is Starmer’s tit for tat.
More civil war in the Labour Party when they should be uniting and exploiting a failing Government.
Nothing really changes in that outdated and not fit for purpose Party.
Ken Livingstone is not only an anti-semoite but is a thieving shyster and his successors are no better.
I learned today that Livingstone had key traffic light junctions in central London altered with longer phasing on red . This caused far more congestion and pollution. That way he could justify to irate motorists who overnight found their journey time was artificially made longer, the new congestion charge that he and his cronies trousered.One big deception and it's carried on since 2002.The current idiot i/c tfl is increasing the CCZ exponentionally also.
I learned today that Livingstone had key traffic light junctions in central London altered with longer phasing on red . This caused far more congestion and pollution. That way he could justify to irate motorists who overnight found their journey time was artificially made longer, the new congestion charge that he and his cronies trousered.One big deception and it's carried on since 2002.The current idiot i/c tfl is increasing the CCZ exponentionally also.
Sunk
Just read the first three paragraphs and then PYSL.
https:/
Just read the first three paragraphs and then PYSL.
https:/
Retrocop,
I read further than the third paragraph, and it said this...
// The accusation is vehemently denied by Transport for London (TfL), the mayoral body in charge of major roads and all the capital's traffic lights. But TfL has now admitted, in a written answer to Conservative members of the Greater London Authority that more than 300 traffic lights have been altered in the past eight months – but for a variety of reasons none of which, it says, are to deliberately create traffic chaos.
Traffic light timings, it claims, have been altered to give pedestrians longer to cross roads, to give priority to buses and to deter cars from major snarl-ups around roadwork schemes in places like Trafalgar Square. //
Parsing is constantly being amended all the time, during Livingstone tenure, Boris’ and Khan’s today.
I ask again, if it was a scam, why did Johnson support it for 8 years?
I read further than the third paragraph, and it said this...
// The accusation is vehemently denied by Transport for London (TfL), the mayoral body in charge of major roads and all the capital's traffic lights. But TfL has now admitted, in a written answer to Conservative members of the Greater London Authority that more than 300 traffic lights have been altered in the past eight months – but for a variety of reasons none of which, it says, are to deliberately create traffic chaos.
Traffic light timings, it claims, have been altered to give pedestrians longer to cross roads, to give priority to buses and to deter cars from major snarl-ups around roadwork schemes in places like Trafalgar Square. //
Parsing is constantly being amended all the time, during Livingstone tenure, Boris’ and Khan’s today.
I ask again, if it was a scam, why did Johnson support it for 8 years?
