Jokes7 mins ago
Ok Let's Do The Usual Dance.......
323 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.naomi - // AH, I’ll ignore your nonsense but simply say this is at least the third thread I’ve seen where you’ve laid into Theland on the same issue. //
And I'll ignore yours - along with the hypicrisy that you send threads into the hundreds with your arguments with Theland - as I said, apparently it's OK for you to do it ...
And I'll ignore yours - along with the hypicrisy that you send threads into the hundreds with your arguments with Theland - as I said, apparently it's OK for you to do it ...
naomi - // AH, it seems none of you have a grasp of either book. If you had you would know why one is open to interpretation ad the other not. //
Anything and everything is open to interpretation, if anyone wishes it to be so.
The idea that you can declaim that the bible has wriggle room when it suits, and the Koran does not, is simply your interpretation, which rather proves my point.
Anything and everything is open to interpretation, if anyone wishes it to be so.
The idea that you can declaim that the bible has wriggle room when it suits, and the Koran does not, is simply your interpretation, which rather proves my point.
Why not just wait for the facts to be revealed?
Speculating a muslim or a mental case before we know anything is pointless. In a few hours we will have a name, and whether they were known to the authorities for terrorist connections, or by mental health providers.
It has the MO of a terrorist attack, but we should hold fire until that is confirmed.
Speculating a muslim or a mental case before we know anything is pointless. In a few hours we will have a name, and whether they were known to the authorities for terrorist connections, or by mental health providers.
It has the MO of a terrorist attack, but we should hold fire until that is confirmed.
Theland - // By the way, Muslims consider the Koran, not inspired, but a mirac!e, as they believe it was given to Mo verbatim and cannot ever be changed. //
Contrary to the lofty (and incorrect most of the time) views of our fellow poster Naomi, I am aware of the basic pricniples of the two faiths, and their difference.
I do not believe that the difference negates the ability of any individual to interpret his or her holy text in a way that they are comfortable with - and I that any worshiper on any faith does exactly that.
You as a Christian must be aware that to literally carry out each and every word of the bible is simply not possible, so you take the bits that work for you, and apply them.
No problem - unless of course you deny that same principle to any other faith, in this case Islam - because that is simply religious superiority, and again, it has no place in your belief system.
Contrary to the lofty (and incorrect most of the time) views of our fellow poster Naomi, I am aware of the basic pricniples of the two faiths, and their difference.
I do not believe that the difference negates the ability of any individual to interpret his or her holy text in a way that they are comfortable with - and I that any worshiper on any faith does exactly that.
You as a Christian must be aware that to literally carry out each and every word of the bible is simply not possible, so you take the bits that work for you, and apply them.
No problem - unless of course you deny that same principle to any other faith, in this case Islam - because that is simply religious superiority, and again, it has no place in your belief system.
AH, //The idea that you can declaim that the bible has wriggle room when it suits, and the Koran does not//
That is not what I claim.
Neither jno’s nor zac’s posts are relevant.
Why people are so eager to distance these acts of terrorism from the source is beyond me - because until we are prepared to acknowledge that source we have no hope of combatting it.
That is not what I claim.
Neither jno’s nor zac’s posts are relevant.
Why people are so eager to distance these acts of terrorism from the source is beyond me - because until we are prepared to acknowledge that source we have no hope of combatting it.
// People are dead at the hands of yet another madman.//
and we are at the mercy of yet another mad writer/poster
by the time of 2 Samuel - the record is deffo historical. In Egypt we were digging up - ---
Mainstream scholars agree that Taharqa is the Biblical "Tirhakah", king of Ethiopia (Kush), who waged war against Sennacherib during the reign of King Hezekiah of Judah (2 Kings 19:9;)
(or 4 kings in LXX) and that is around 660BC which we er egyptologists wd look on as rather late.
cuneiform tablet has turned up reconfirming the name of Hezekiah's jailer - putting the noses of the those who believe that the OT is inerrant, rather out of joint
and we are at the mercy of yet another mad writer/poster
by the time of 2 Samuel - the record is deffo historical. In Egypt we were digging up - ---
Mainstream scholars agree that Taharqa is the Biblical "Tirhakah", king of Ethiopia (Kush), who waged war against Sennacherib during the reign of King Hezekiah of Judah (2 Kings 19:9;)
(or 4 kings in LXX) and that is around 660BC which we er egyptologists wd look on as rather late.
cuneiform tablet has turned up reconfirming the name of Hezekiah's jailer - putting the noses of the those who believe that the OT is inerrant, rather out of joint