> Ellipsis, What do you mean?
Sticking with the holocaust denial example - this is illegal in some countries and not others. So when you wrote ...
> People should be able to say what they want to say - but if they say something that is against the law then they must face the consequences of breaking the law. In that instance I doubt this organisation would defend that.
Would the organisation defend the freedom of speech required to deny the Holocaust?
Also, to quote your example: "an Imam inciting others" - this may not be illegal in the country in which the Imam resides. If the Imam is a member of the FSU, will the FSU defend the Imam's right to free speech?
I'm not saying it should or it shouldn't. All I'm saying is that freedom of speech is a tricky area, as events in the USA are showing, and that for an organisation to set itself up as the "Free Speech Union", it should make clear where it sees the boundaries, if any, especially if it's asking for money.