Begum Supreme Court Ruling Today

[fender62]

i wonder how this will turn out, the weka judges will erm probably let her return, thus allowing all the others to do the same, moneys no object or public safety only points of law matter.
https://news.sky.com/story/shamima-begum-is-bride-to-find-out-whether-she-can-return-to-the-uk-to-fight-citizenship-decision-12229127

[gulliver1]

13.06 Have you anything constructive to add to this thread.

[Bobbisox1]

A darn sight more than you Gulliver.....to any thread !

[dannyk13]

Is this constuctive enough for you Gulliver?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8537141/Sir-Keir-Starmer-led-charge-allow-ISIS-bride-Shamima-Begum-return-Britain.html

[Spicerack]

Wasn't Bobbi right in what she said, gully?
I suspect your 'revelation' was old news.

[gulliver1]

It seems odd to me that these four Con MPS seem like they are in favour of letting Begum return . Just saying.

[dannyk13]

Gulliver, and you don't consider it odd that Keir Starmer is doing the same thing?

[Bobbisox1]

Still it shouldn't impact on your expat life Gulliver should it :0)

[gulliver1]

If I remember correctly one of the Con Mps in favour of letting Begum return, is one Andrew Mitchell who allegedly referred to the Police as Plebs.

[Jackdaw33]

I'm very surprised at David Davis being one of them.

[dannyk13]

Gulliver, what has that got to do with the OP.Have you nothing constructive to add?

[gulliver1]

13.30 Read the headline of this post, its about Begum returning to the UK
(Andrew Mitchell) wants to let Begum back into the Uk .
Get it. ? Try and keep up Danny.

[Bobbisox1]

Sighhhhh, Gulliver it's all over ,she ain't getting in, get it? Got it? Good !

[dannyk13]

Gulliver, don't be so facetious I was referring to your allegation that Andrew Mitchell had called the police plebs.

[dannyk13]

Gulliverm also, I notice that you have nothing to say about Starmer leading Labour MP's in wanting her to be allowed back.

[Bobbisox1]

Danny have you ever known Gulliver to address a point ?
No? Me either :0)

[jim360]

In answer to Jackdaw's question about David Davis's views on Begum, the clear reasons that Davis "wanted"* Begum back were: so that she could face justice for her crimes; so that she wasn't left in a country and potentially at the mercy of terrorists to radicalise her (and, when he wrote about this a few years ago, her then-living child) still further; not doing anything about her and others like her risks antagonising the US. In any case, it certainly wasn't because he was happy to see a terrorist, or a person associating with or raised by terrorists, to run wild and free with all the consequent risks that would have posed, and I don't see either that it was out of sympathy for her lot. At most, then, it seems to be stemmed from a rejection of the idea that "out of sight, out of mind", and a belief in the authority and decency of British Justice.

It should be stated that I am interpreting, as best I can, Davis's views, and I'm not expressing my own in this post.

[Jackdaw33]

Yes, I now see where he is coming from. Cage the wild animal before it causes further harm.

[Spicerack]

Clearly wasn't one of your hard line rants, jim.

[gulliver1]

13.50 , Seems like you have started answering your own Questions , thats the first sign of it.

[Bobbisox1]

Do keep to the thread Gulliver, there's a good chap:0)