Donate SIGN UP

Napier Barracks Migrants

Avatar Image
fender62 | 15:33 Thu 03rd Jun 2021 | News
48 Answers
the judge knows these so called migrants are not migrants but criminals, and all young men
of middle eastern backgrounds? what did one criminal say, food bad and no internet!...really
then why not ask to stay in france..or the countries they traveled through to get to france?
they all must be war torn erm.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9647585/Conditions-inside-Napier-Barracks-UNLAWFUL.html
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 48rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Naomi, do you have backup for you assertion? I thought that people could arrive here and request asylum
Question Author
Atheist, thye are supposed to claim asylm in the first safe country they arrive in and not cherry pick, they came from france and before that?
italy greece probably, where they should have claimed aylum, it's the law.
fender, can you support your assertion?
fender, if it is that clear cut and simple, why are they kept here?
They're kept here because we're too bleedin' soft simply to turn the boats around in the opposite direction.
//fender, if it is that clear cut and simple, why are they kept here?//
Because its not easy to find another country that will take them- theyd say "not us guv, they might of passed through but there not ours"
Now they know they can wreck the joint then complain the place is unfit and all the bleeding hearts will be behind them.
//fender, can you support your assertion?//

I'll save fender the trouble: The UN convention on the Status of Refugees (1951), Article 31:

ARTICLE 31. REFUGEES UNLAWFULLY IN THE COUNTRY OF REFUGE

1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of Article 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to
the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.

Note "...coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of Article 1". People arriving from France are not under such a threat.

Those arriving from France are illegal immigrants, plain and simple, and are liable to penalties. The UK is currently under an invasion by such people. The answer to it is to prevent their entry, by force if necessary, into UK territorial waters. They are perfectly safe in France and under no threat. The UK is their "destination of choice" but the asylum system does not afford them that choice. Time to stop fannying around - in fact that time passed long ago.
You can repeat that till the cows come home but the bleeding liberal hearts here won't have it. To them these people, having trekked the length of Europe thanks to the ridiculous Schengen agreement, then attempted to cross the channel in flimsy boats, are heroes, and should be welcomed with open arms and fêted.
NJ, if you look at part 2 in this document from the House of Commons Library, you'll see that isn't the case.

https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9000/CBP-9000.pdf
-- answer removed --
I dont know why these economic migrants are kept there.Didnt Wee Burney,Lily Allen,Bob Gobshi..sorry Geldof,Gary Lineker all claim to want to take in these illegals.Anyone on AB able to tell me how many they actually took in,and are they still living with them?
-- answer removed --
What do we invade them with, TTT. An army that would fit quite comfortably inside Old Trafford - when it's not helping out with Covid? Tanks that cannot do more than 20 mph without giving the occupants tinnitus and cannot be fired while exceeding 20 mph?
-- answer removed --
It would be illegal to take in any person illegally here.

Some have offered homes to refugees, not sure how many of those well known who offered have taken any in but others have.
One of those 'if only I was allowed to' freebies then?

Used to be called all mouth and trousers.
No idea Doug, I only know that people can and do offer homes to refugees, some short term and others for longer.

I don't mind if I don'r know their names, it's their business.
Question Author
the public are sick to death of these p@ss take freeloaders, i suppose the elite care not a jot in there ivory towers, ohh the plebs are are complaining...let them eat cake.
ken: "What do we invade them with, TTT. An army that would fit quite" - nowt at the mo ken I agree, but spend the 400bn and more we just spent on Covid on getting a decent military do what we did in the 19th century, it'd save a lot in the long run.

21 to 40 of 48rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Napier Barracks Migrants

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.