ChatterBank1 min ago
How Can You Have A Pregnant Man?
157 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It isn't. Please clarify then?
All it looks like- is that women have had to battle for centuries for everything, education, work, careers, daily sexism, safety, spaces, not being controlled in what to wear, how to present... and men just aren't used to that. It's pure entitlement.
Instead of having the guts to defend their own rights and say "we want more freedom", their answer is to just invade women's instead. Rude.
All it looks like- is that women have had to battle for centuries for everything, education, work, careers, daily sexism, safety, spaces, not being controlled in what to wear, how to present... and men just aren't used to that. It's pure entitlement.
Instead of having the guts to defend their own rights and say "we want more freedom", their answer is to just invade women's instead. Rude.
Oh come on Pixie, this isn't guys wanting a bit of the action. This is about people of different genders and sexualities wanting to be accepted. I know women haven't had it easy historically, but neither have those folk. The same kind on men who want to demean and control women, would much rather those folk were wiped off the map.
I can subscribe to whichever view I choose, thanks. I've always advocated for women's rights, and I don't believe that they are mutually exclusive with trans rights. The trick is only to persuade people that this is the case.
Also, the expansion of a definition of a word doesn't destroy the old meaning. It merely adds to it. This is the case with, for example, marriage, which used exclusively to mean a union between a man and woman, and no longer does; or "parent", which is not strictly tied to biology either, given that adoptive parents are parents; and so on.
Also, the expansion of a definition of a word doesn't destroy the old meaning. It merely adds to it. This is the case with, for example, marriage, which used exclusively to mean a union between a man and woman, and no longer does; or "parent", which is not strictly tied to biology either, given that adoptive parents are parents; and so on.
They don't necessarily, and they are.
One thing women have managed to achieve, with effort, are their own sports, safe spaces, clubs, meetings and are allowed legally to exclude men. All for obvious reasons, that haven't changed. Of course it destroys that. It has done and still is.
Even mozz seems to be admitting the problem is "other men". And yet, women aren't allowed to feel the same way.
One thing women have managed to achieve, with effort, are their own sports, safe spaces, clubs, meetings and are allowed legally to exclude men. All for obvious reasons, that haven't changed. Of course it destroys that. It has done and still is.
Even mozz seems to be admitting the problem is "other men". And yet, women aren't allowed to feel the same way.
Jim, //I don't believe that they are mutually exclusive with trans rights.//
Because you don’t want them to be. You want trans to be accepted as women - but they’re not - and they never will be. You were right when you said, ‘There is no dispute over the biological fact that only a person with a functioning uterus can get pregnant’. That’ll be women then.
// The trick is only to persuade people that this is the case.//
That’s exactly what this nonsense is - a trick - that no one with any sense will ever fall for.
Because you don’t want them to be. You want trans to be accepted as women - but they’re not - and they never will be. You were right when you said, ‘There is no dispute over the biological fact that only a person with a functioning uterus can get pregnant’. That’ll be women then.
// The trick is only to persuade people that this is the case.//
That’s exactly what this nonsense is - a trick - that no one with any sense will ever fall for.
It is a rule. It's how it is and always has been. Please feel free to answer the blackfishing question too. Just interested in whether imitation is always fine, or only when women are the targets?
And one last question- what reason is there, why men can't feel, identify, wear, behave, however they like- without having to pretend they are women?
And one last question- what reason is there, why men can't feel, identify, wear, behave, however they like- without having to pretend they are women?
