Jobs & Education1 min ago
Answers
//I don't understand why anyone wouldn't do Twitter.// I did briefly, roy. Which really just showed that humans are dangerously insane. So stopped. And yes mozz, all MPs are at least 2 faced- it's an actual requirement.
19:00 Tue 19th Oct 2021
No Naomi, but we need to be careful, otherwise the usual crowd will be in to detract from the problem.
When, as I am sure it will be from reports, his religion is found to be behind this than will be the time to shout.
Also, I doubt very much Khan wrote that as the correct title has been used (Sir).
When, as I am sure it will be from reports, his religion is found to be behind this than will be the time to shout.
Also, I doubt very much Khan wrote that as the correct title has been used (Sir).
YMB, Khan wouldn't have written it - but this isn't about the murderer's motivation - it's about Khan's obfuscation. He's made noises as courtesy demands - but not the right ones. To describe the MP as having 'passed away' is an insult to the victim and to his family. The man was brutally slain - and purposefully. Unlike the case of Floyd, there is no doubt of that.
"To describe the MP as having 'passed away' is an insult to the victim and to his family."
that is taking things a bit far... i do not think you have any right to take offense on behalf of his family... it does not seem very likely that Sadiq Khan would be out to insult them does it.
"The man was brutally slain - and purposefully. Unlike the case of Floyd, there is no doubt of that."
Floyd's killer was convicted of murder...
that is taking things a bit far... i do not think you have any right to take offense on behalf of his family... it does not seem very likely that Sadiq Khan would be out to insult them does it.
"The man was brutally slain - and purposefully. Unlike the case of Floyd, there is no doubt of that."
Floyd's killer was convicted of murder...
untitled, //i do not think you have any right to take offense on behalf of his family//
What you think is irrelevant to me, but for your information I'm not offended. I'm sickened.
//Floyd's killer was convicted of murder...//
But unlike the MP's killer, that policeman didn't go out that morning with the specific intention of killing a particular man - or of killing anyone at all - did he!
What you think is irrelevant to me, but for your information I'm not offended. I'm sickened.
//Floyd's killer was convicted of murder...//
But unlike the MP's killer, that policeman didn't go out that morning with the specific intention of killing a particular man - or of killing anyone at all - did he!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.