She is charged with committing a public nuisance by indecently exposing her penis to other members of the public, whilst masturbating from a property window.
The sad thing is, this will be recorded as a crime by a woman. Still, who needs facts? We'll be able to say soon, that women commit far more sex crimes than they used to... and baffle each other as to why.
Why does the report refer to him as a woman - and why are you referring to him as 'she'? As far as I'm aware - and I'm pretty sure I'm right here - women don't have penises.
And here's another to wonder about. A man who identifies as a woman is now a senior leader at Girl Guides UK. His hobbies include dressing up as a dominatrix. The Mail calls him a her too.
Naomi, quite some time ago, Brownies and Guides were allowing in boys, who claim to be girls, and removing "tomboys". There was a huge fuss from parents, when they found out a male leader was sleeping in tents with 10 year old girls, and they weren't informed, because he used the magic words "I am a woman".
Roy, out of interest, how would you suggest he should be kept out of a women's prison?
that was what I thought, Ken, anyone of any sex, gender or skin colour would be treated the same. It doesn't seem to have been a terrorist incident and it's not a trans discussion.
I was wondering how this was going to be defended or dismissed on here. 'She' exposes 'her' penis and masturbates in public, the trans bit is an irrelevance. OK.
Add me to the "Ken" way of speaking. First and foremost, if guilty.of those acts, the person is a pervert regardless of gender. I shouldn't think the crimes as described are worth of a custodial sentence (assuming they have no previous), so I shouldn't imagine which prison they are sent to will be of any consequence.