Road rules1 min ago
Why Isn't It Considered Racist
when news stories point out that people are black or people of colour - twice this week stories have centred on someone's ethnicity. The woman who trekked to the South Pole was the 'first woman of colour' to do so and now Sidney Poitier is being hailed as the first black actor to win an Oscar for Best Actor. Surely that is being racist by pointing it out?
Answers
Time we stopped talking about colour and treated people as people. Prejudice won’t end until we do.
07:25 Sat 08th Jan 2022
//Sorry but I don’t consider it unimportant for a white actor to play a white fictional character.//
We'll have to agree to disagree then. I'd rather have someone physically different who encapsulates the spirit of the character than someone similar looking playing a completely unrecognizable version.
We'll have to agree to disagree then. I'd rather have someone physically different who encapsulates the spirit of the character than someone similar looking playing a completely unrecognizable version.
Would it be racist to pass comment on white members of say the Harlem Globetrotters (their first white player was their (short) white Jewish founder, tho he was only in as a sub :-)
The Harlem Globe Trotters are a predominantly black team, and have had three white players on their team.
In a milieu where there’s a predominating of one colour or race then something that breaks the “mould” is worthy of highlighting, I’d say the lady at the South Pole is more a trivia item but she’s a “first” so worthy of mention.
Nothing to do with racism.
I once wrote a sports article where I referenced some “West Indian” spectators a propos of absolutely nothing and while I’d draw the line at branding it “racist” I can see why some were offended (they were black but I had no idea where they were from really)
The Harlem Globe Trotters are a predominantly black team, and have had three white players on their team.
In a milieu where there’s a predominating of one colour or race then something that breaks the “mould” is worthy of highlighting, I’d say the lady at the South Pole is more a trivia item but she’s a “first” so worthy of mention.
Nothing to do with racism.
I once wrote a sports article where I referenced some “West Indian” spectators a propos of absolutely nothing and while I’d draw the line at branding it “racist” I can see why some were offended (they were black but I had no idea where they were from really)
//That muddies the discussion. Realistic representation is the issue - not an actor's ability to play the part.//
Again, I disagree. We are after all, talking about actors. Ability to play the role is more important than physical similarity. An actor should be chosen on suitability to portray the role. Not discounted because he is the wrong colour (that works both ways). The only time race is a necessary factor is when they are portraying a character whose race is an important part of their character. With Bond, it really isn't.
Again, I disagree. We are after all, talking about actors. Ability to play the role is more important than physical similarity. An actor should be chosen on suitability to portray the role. Not discounted because he is the wrong colour (that works both ways). The only time race is a necessary factor is when they are portraying a character whose race is an important part of their character. With Bond, it really isn't.