Crosswords0 min ago
Oxford Union
This really is worth a half-hour's watch. Four young, articulate men, stating their views on the war in Ukraine, a real credit to the University (& Britain).
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.My impressions aren't gleaned solely from the news, Khandro. Personal experience of speaking to some of the boy/girl wonders leaves me more than bemused at times. Gobsmacked would be a better word.
Interestingly, one of the speakers was rather astute in mentioning the short term impact that news has on the media. One popular tabloid has had the death of Shane Warne as headline news for the past two days, the war in Ukraine now taking second place.
Interestingly, one of the speakers was rather astute in mentioning the short term impact that news has on the media. One popular tabloid has had the death of Shane Warne as headline news for the past two days, the war in Ukraine now taking second place.
Khando / naomi24 - what is it about the debate you found interesting? The idea that the autocracy argument is false; the idea that the democratic states don’t have a red line? The failure that we don’t have a moral framework?
I agree with the best option for now is an economic war but the second speaker got completely lost at the end. The Ukraine could not join the EU because that would be bringing the EU up to the door of Russia.
Same with Ukraine joining NATO.
I agree with the best option for now is an economic war but the second speaker got completely lost at the end. The Ukraine could not join the EU because that would be bringing the EU up to the door of Russia.
Same with Ukraine joining NATO.
He went on to say that we cannot send troops to the East as this would provoke Russia into escalating (the nuclear option), but Putin has described ecumenic sanctions as an act of war.
The Taiwan point was very well put.
I totally disagree with the point of the fourth speaker that the news cycle will probably move on. Yes, the stories from last month were about Tory sleaze, but this is considerably bigger. This is more Kosovo than the Crimea.
What were your thoughts on the ideas?
I assume that’s what we’re talking about here - content rather than presentation.
Do you agree with the idea of hurting Russia by building new gas pipelines? From Turkey? Economically - it that practical?
The banning of all cultural activity?
I liked the point of the ‘London laundromat’.
Your thoughts?
The Taiwan point was very well put.
I totally disagree with the point of the fourth speaker that the news cycle will probably move on. Yes, the stories from last month were about Tory sleaze, but this is considerably bigger. This is more Kosovo than the Crimea.
What were your thoughts on the ideas?
I assume that’s what we’re talking about here - content rather than presentation.
Do you agree with the idea of hurting Russia by building new gas pipelines? From Turkey? Economically - it that practical?
The banning of all cultural activity?
I liked the point of the ‘London laundromat’.
Your thoughts?