Donate SIGN UP

Will Smith

Avatar Image
tiggerblue10 | 11:20 Mon 28th Mar 2022 | News
77 Answers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-60897004

Do you think Will was justified in slapping one on Chris Rock? I really like Will and will admit to having a wee crush on him but he shouldn't have resorted to violence. Having said that, Chris was an idiot saying what he said considering Jada has a medical condition, alopecia.
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 77 of 77rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by tiggerblue10. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
He's always appeared somewhat manic when interviewed, maybe this is the next step in an ongoing process.

Or he coud just be a bit of a knob.
Bald wives matter.
Meanwhile the bug race is heading towards the earth - who can stop them ?
Despite what the woke brigade would have you believe, the word "inclusion" does not solely refer to people. However, in the run up this year, it appeared that was all The Academy had in mind.

For the want of a nail, the shoe was lost...

Over many years The Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences has evolved the Oscars' ceremony to the level of a tacky circus. The event lacks decorum and the behaviour of "celebrities" is often of a regrettable standard. Glamour has been replaced by many for shockability effect.

How can any respectable organisation not vet the script of the host(s) prior to going live or make sure that all speakers at the podium are given but a short time to deliver their (well-prepared, no doubt) speeches. It used to be a simple matter of acknowledgement and appreciation (although Greer Garson's effort gave her the world record for longest thank you!).

I remember that the "audience" used to occupy stalls seating throughout the evening - who decided to seat some so close to the main stage?

The people in this industry can be paid obscene amounts of money and in return others will pay the asking price to view the films.
The fortune spent on producing this annual, sad occasion could be spent far better elsewhere.

I expect the wheels are already in motion for the 2023 Oscars, just hope someone concentrates on the basics next year and includes all aspects of what for the Americans should be a show case to be proud of and not ridiculed. Whoever thinks that this year's offering made good television sadly is deluded.

George C Scott may have had the right answer to the garbage that is The Oscars.

All this is my opinion of course, but I, too, have the right of inclusion ;)

choux

You wrote:

"Despite what the woke brigade would have you believe, the word "inclusion" does not solely refer to people. However, in the run up this year, it appeared that was all The Academy had in mind."

Just want to make sure I understand your point - the Academy was so focussed on inclusivity that it forgot something else.

Is that it?


You wrote:

Glamour has been replaced by many for shockability effect.

I've watched the show for years and can't think of many occasions where shock has usurped glamour. Can you name some examples?

The seating changed a couple of years ago (Covid) - think it looks much better and you don't have winners having to sprint from row 23 when they're to pick up their statue.

//The people in this industry can be paid obscene amounts of money and in return others will pay the asking price to view the films.//

Not obscene when you think of the amount of money they generate.

//The fortune spent on producing this annual, sad occasion could be spent far better elsewhere.//

The Oscars actually generate money:

https://www.quora.com/How-much-revenue-does-the-Academy-Awards-show-generate
//The event lacks decorum and the behaviour of "celebrities" is often of a regrettable standard. Glamour has been replaced by many for shockability effect.//

As in other aspects of "modern" life ... the more diverse the intended message the more violent the outcome.
SP, I cannot help but think you are picking the bones for argument's sake. It is not going to happen, sunshine. Have a nice evening.
" How can any respectable organisation not vet the script of the host(s) prior to going live..."
Apparently Rock's words were vetted...but the offending joke was not included. I guess he thought it was a good idea at the time for a bit of off the cuff "humour".
choux

Pretty sure I’m only disagreeing with your position.
What a great roll model for kids to look upto.........Not
Fatalbertfixer

Err...a roll model?

This is a model roll.

tinyurl.com/ye2xyfv2
No, he was not justified, and has made a fool of himself.

He should have waited until afterwards, and slapped him in private.
come on:
slapped him in the privates
chrissakes
Their world, let em play.
No, I don't. The joke was about her hair-do--a buzz cut--and it was twisted and manipulated into a cruel insult about her hair loss, which was unknown to most of the world. This is what abusers do and how they justify their violence.
Will Smith? Seems to have made the answer to that question abundantly clear.
Does Chris Rock? You've seen it live on the Oscar Awards 2022. Now a veteran of unvetted jokes.

61 to 77 of 77rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Do you know the answer?

Will Smith

Answer Question >>