News35 mins ago
Kier Starmer
80 Answers
What on earth is he thinking? He says if he receives a FPN he'll resign. Farewell then his 'vision' for Britain. But if he is not served with a FPN he'll carry on. So how does this ridiculous stunt further Labour prospects?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Paigntonian. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Avatar Image Togo
//it's a glove slap to Boris.//
What sort of narcissist issues a challenge to a duel when they have no weapons ... or discernable abilities, that suggest they have either the stomach for a fight or the courage(bottle to you) to face a danger in the first place? I wonder what his mush looks like right now. He looks distraught when he is deliriously happy. He must be a picture of abject pity.
Are you describing Starmer or Johnson?
Johnson issues challenges whilst at the despatch box regularly, but runs from Parliament when challenged or gets his lackeys to resign for his law-breaking and indiscretions.
//it's a glove slap to Boris.//
What sort of narcissist issues a challenge to a duel when they have no weapons ... or discernable abilities, that suggest they have either the stomach for a fight or the courage(bottle to you) to face a danger in the first place? I wonder what his mush looks like right now. He looks distraught when he is deliriously happy. He must be a picture of abject pity.
Are you describing Starmer or Johnson?
Johnson issues challenges whilst at the despatch box regularly, but runs from Parliament when challenged or gets his lackeys to resign for his law-breaking and indiscretions.
Is the threat to resign and daring the Durham Constabulary to issue him and his accomplices with a fine a deliberate, though indirect, attempt at interfering with the judicial process? That is serious. Never mind tough on cake, tough on the causes of cake, it could be considered as a criminal offence. Is this ex barrister and DPP in anyway actually familiar with the laws of the land. He has got Falconer fighting his corner I am told. Bliar's ex legal bully boy. Cesspit of hypocrites.
Togo,
Pressed by the Tories he has been avoiding questions all weekend.
Now that he has, you’re making all sorts of wild accusations that have no basis or credence.
Pop along to your nearest McDonalds, they have an abundance of straws in several dispensers in there for you.
As for Falconer, I’d hazard a guess that the former DPP might have enough wherewithal and nouse to tackle a FPN on his own merit.
If unable and he’s deemed to have fallen foul of the law he’ll do the honourable thing and resign.
You’re having your cake and eating it yet now inexplicably you don’t like the cake?
Make up your mind and stop dithering.
Pressed by the Tories he has been avoiding questions all weekend.
Now that he has, you’re making all sorts of wild accusations that have no basis or credence.
Pop along to your nearest McDonalds, they have an abundance of straws in several dispensers in there for you.
As for Falconer, I’d hazard a guess that the former DPP might have enough wherewithal and nouse to tackle a FPN on his own merit.
If unable and he’s deemed to have fallen foul of the law he’ll do the honourable thing and resign.
You’re having your cake and eating it yet now inexplicably you don’t like the cake?
Make up your mind and stop dithering.
Is this ex barrister and DPP in anyway actually familiar with the laws of the land. He has got Falconer fighting his corner I am told. Bliar's ex legal bully boy.
You mean like the laws of the land that the Johnson administration implemented yet conveniently forgot about on at least 12 separate occasions?
Care to revise the hypocrisy accusation?
You mean like the laws of the land that the Johnson administration implemented yet conveniently forgot about on at least 12 separate occasions?
Care to revise the hypocrisy accusation?
"Is the threat to resign and daring the Durham Constabulary to issue him and his accomplices with a fine a deliberate, though indirect, attempt at interfering with the judicial process?"
If he had said he wouldn't resign if given a FPN, he would have been criticized. If he had stayed silent, he would have been criticized.
What should he have said then?
If he had said he wouldn't resign if given a FPN, he would have been criticized. If he had stayed silent, he would have been criticized.
What should he have said then?
Maybe there's a method in his madness. Maybe he knows that whatever happens he's on his way out and so will take the opportunity to jump before his pushed. With his fans extolling the qualities of his dubious honesty and integrity, to walk away under the pretence of 'doing the right thing' must be an attractive option. Labour, I fear, is pretty much dead - and has been for a very long time.