News3 mins ago
Is Rees-Mogg A Hypocrite?
Answers
He said the outcome for May was a, “terrible result for the Prime Minister”. He said about Johnson's vote, “It was a good victory for the prime minister, he won comfortably" Regardless of what he said the respective PMs should do next, those comments alone are hypocritical .
17:42 Wed 08th Jun 2022
hypocrisy
a situation in which someone pretends to believe something that they do not really believe, or that is the opposite of what they do or say at another time:
* [JRM] has one rule for [Boris Johnson] and another rule for [Theresa May] and it's sheer hypocrisy.
https:/ /dictio nary.ca mbridge .org/di ctionar y/engli sh/hypo crisy
a situation in which someone pretends to believe something that they do not really believe, or that is the opposite of what they do or say at another time:
* [JRM] has one rule for [Boris Johnson] and another rule for [Theresa May] and it's sheer hypocrisy.
https:/
Come off it with the dictionary definition, ellipsis. Comparisons can only be made when circumstances align. Treacherous Mrs May, with her snap general election, designed to rally support for her wonky, duplicitous Brexit deal, lost the government its majority and the result of the confidence vote was bad for her - and for good reason. Her whole premiership was a disaster for this country as was she. JRM was right to want rid of her.
> How would May's proposed deal have been treacherous and duplicitous?
It doesn't matter. What matters is that Jacob Rees-Mogg thought Theresa May should go purely based on the numbers - because of the size of the vote against her - but didn't think Boris Johnson should go on the same numerical basis, despite having an even bigger vote against him. In fact, Rees-Mogg also said that even if Johnson won by only one vote, that would be sufficient ... total hypocrisy.
It doesn't matter. What matters is that Jacob Rees-Mogg thought Theresa May should go purely based on the numbers - because of the size of the vote against her - but didn't think Boris Johnson should go on the same numerical basis, despite having an even bigger vote against him. In fact, Rees-Mogg also said that even if Johnson won by only one vote, that would be sufficient ... total hypocrisy.
Ellipsis, if you’re talking about honesty, making it up as you go along does nothing for your credibility. He didn’t want her to go ‘purely based on numbers’ as you claim. He wanted her to go because she was a bad prime minister who did her utmost to thwart democracy by refusing to honour the result of the EU referendum, and furthermore by decimating the government’s majority with her arrogant stupidity in calling a snap general election. The numbers confirmed that he wasn’t alone in holding that opinion. Although ultimately the numbers were a good result for the country - we got shot of her - they were, for her personally, disastrous. He was absolutely right.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.