News0 min ago
The Queen
The Queen across her 70 years of reign dealt with 15 Prime Ministers and out of those 15 , the one she loathed the most was (have a guess)!.
...Yes you are right.... It was Boris Johnson.
...Yes you are right.... It was Boris Johnson.
Answers
A lot of people think Boris is a clown, I can't see any good reason why the Queen wouldn't have been of them.
21:17 Mon 12th Sep 2022
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
//Odd how some dismiss the OP poster for ‘ignorance’ when all he did was mirror what has been reported in a newspaper and dismiss it as fantasy.//
So let’s take a look:
“The Queen across her 70 years of reign dealt with 15 Prime Ministers and out of those 15 , the one she loathed the most was (have a guess)!.
...Yes you are right.... It was Boris Johnson.”
Without being granted the privilege of seeing the said report, how can it be said the OP was simply mirroring something from it? All the OP has done is make a statement as if it was fact. No source quoted, no idea of who (if anybody) said it. Yes, we were provided with a link to a report which seems to say what he’s suggesting (an hour and a quarter later). But from the OP, wall I see is his own personal opinion.
Little wonder it was dismissed.
So let’s take a look:
“The Queen across her 70 years of reign dealt with 15 Prime Ministers and out of those 15 , the one she loathed the most was (have a guess)!.
...Yes you are right.... It was Boris Johnson.”
Without being granted the privilege of seeing the said report, how can it be said the OP was simply mirroring something from it? All the OP has done is make a statement as if it was fact. No source quoted, no idea of who (if anybody) said it. Yes, we were provided with a link to a report which seems to say what he’s suggesting (an hour and a quarter later). But from the OP, wall I see is his own personal opinion.
Little wonder it was dismissed.
I just stuck a random PM's name down but that is equally as valid as Gully's nonsense.
Although watching the various programs this week Heath wasn't popular.
//The life-long bachelor was said to have struggled with small talk, and found his weekly audiences with the Queen ‘frosty’, likely due to their differing views on the Commonwealth. //
Although watching the various programs this week Heath wasn't popular.
//The life-long bachelor was said to have struggled with small talk, and found his weekly audiences with the Queen ‘frosty’, likely due to their differing views on the Commonwealth. //
//I’d hazard that more than 50% of the country would have no reason to doubt the report,...//
What report?
There was no report mentioned in the OP. Just a statement from Gulliver. It's been left to others to guess whether what he stated was his own opinion, a matter of fact or of conjecture buried in some (unquoted) report. A couple of people have had a stab at finding the report but we're still none the wiser as to why he suggested what he did in his OP.
What report?
There was no report mentioned in the OP. Just a statement from Gulliver. It's been left to others to guess whether what he stated was his own opinion, a matter of fact or of conjecture buried in some (unquoted) report. A couple of people have had a stab at finding the report but we're still none the wiser as to why he suggested what he did in his OP.
New Judge
//I’d hazard that more than 50% of the country would have no reason to doubt the report,...//
What report?
There was no report mentioned in the OP. Just a statement from Gulliver. It's been left to others to guess whether what he stated was his own opinion, a matter of fact or of conjecture buried in some (unquoted) report. A couple of people have had a stab at finding the report but we're still none the wiser as to why he suggested what he did in his OP./
The one I provided a few posts later, but we’ll ignore your coyness and dispense with the semantics.
//I’d hazard that more than 50% of the country would have no reason to doubt the report,...//
What report?
There was no report mentioned in the OP. Just a statement from Gulliver. It's been left to others to guess whether what he stated was his own opinion, a matter of fact or of conjecture buried in some (unquoted) report. A couple of people have had a stab at finding the report but we're still none the wiser as to why he suggested what he did in his OP./
The one I provided a few posts later, but we’ll ignore your coyness and dispense with the semantics.