News11 mins ago
Labour And The Mini-Budget
86 Answers
Labour Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves says Kwarteng's statement is a repudiation of 12 years of Tory government. Labour should welcome it then, as they have slammed the Tories' economic policies for all of that time.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Paigntonian. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//People like you on £100K don’t need a tax cut. You will not spend any more you will just stash it away.//
1) I am on far more then 100K
2) I have plenty stashed away I dont need to stash any more at this point in my career. If you could see my monthly credit card bill you would see I spend it.
So assumed nonsense again from you.
1) I am on far more then 100K
2) I have plenty stashed away I dont need to stash any more at this point in my career. If you could see my monthly credit card bill you would see I spend it.
So assumed nonsense again from you.
youngmafbog
//Oversea shopper no vat is they trying to tell us summit//
/Yes, it should tell you that they are trying to encourage shoppers from abroad to spend in this country./
Good luck with that!
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/m adecom- to-lay- off-sta ff-as-w ebsite- eyes-sa le-amid -poor-e conomic -condit ions-12 703696
//Oversea shopper no vat is they trying to tell us summit//
/Yes, it should tell you that they are trying to encourage shoppers from abroad to spend in this country./
Good luck with that!
https:/
As I said earlier, sorting out the final pay-day for the diabolically wealthy before they’re ousted.
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/k wasi-kw artengs -mini-b udget-i s-an-ec onomic- experim ent-tha t-will- test-th e-patie nce-of- the-tor y-party -and-th e-marke ts-1270 3886
From the link:
/Tory orthodoxy, not Treasury orthodoxy, was the casualty in this statement. Today's biggest immediate winners are the top
1% - the 660,000 people who earn more than £150.000 - who
will now benefit by an average cut of £10,000 a year.
The tax cuts will do little to help those at the very bottom of society./
https:/
From the link:
/Tory orthodoxy, not Treasury orthodoxy, was the casualty in this statement. Today's biggest immediate winners are the top
1% - the 660,000 people who earn more than £150.000 - who
will now benefit by an average cut of £10,000 a year.
The tax cuts will do little to help those at the very bottom of society./
Ymb is correct.
For far too long those with the”broadest shoulders” (as both Ashworth and Sturgeon has described the middle in the past) have been expected to bear the brunt, which is fundamentally unfair, so stimulating the economy, and not punishing the middle for having the bare faced temerity to do ok in life, is long overdue.
The middle are the spenders, and they are net contributors taking little, if anything, out of the system.
This is good news.
For far too long those with the”broadest shoulders” (as both Ashworth and Sturgeon has described the middle in the past) have been expected to bear the brunt, which is fundamentally unfair, so stimulating the economy, and not punishing the middle for having the bare faced temerity to do ok in life, is long overdue.
The middle are the spenders, and they are net contributors taking little, if anything, out of the system.
This is good news.
Deskdiary
//I could explain how it works to the fiscally illiterate, fattichInch, but you wouldn't understand, so I won't.//
Aw, go on, you can even do it in simple terms if you like? It’s only sums, isn’t it?
If not, can you explain why the news has been met with scorn, scepticism and utter derision by the world markets and financial experts alike, across the board?
The only people who deemed it good are boardrooms and CEO’s.
So if you won’t explain it all to the fiscally illiterate, do it for the sceptically savvy instead?
//I could explain how it works to the fiscally illiterate, fattichInch, but you wouldn't understand, so I won't.//
Aw, go on, you can even do it in simple terms if you like? It’s only sums, isn’t it?
If not, can you explain why the news has been met with scorn, scepticism and utter derision by the world markets and financial experts alike, across the board?
The only people who deemed it good are boardrooms and CEO’s.
So if you won’t explain it all to the fiscally illiterate, do it for the sceptically savvy instead?
"Why not discuss instead what the Government have done, and whether it will help pensioners and the low paid through the cost of living crisis?"
Whisper it (and I know I'm going to get completely lambasted for this) but I don't care whether this helps the low paid.
All I care about are me and mine, and the more money in my pocket to care for me an mine the better, and I really couldn't give a tinker's cuss about somebody down the road (but the truth is, when push comes to shove, the vast majority are of the same mindset, they're just not prepared to admit it).
Whisper it (and I know I'm going to get completely lambasted for this) but I don't care whether this helps the low paid.
All I care about are me and mine, and the more money in my pocket to care for me an mine the better, and I really couldn't give a tinker's cuss about somebody down the road (but the truth is, when push comes to shove, the vast majority are of the same mindset, they're just not prepared to admit it).