'Qatargate'

[Khandro]

A little treat for AB remainers;

[sp1814]

CB

Eh?

[CoolBritannia]

I accidently replied before completing my post. Should read:

Thanks Khandro. From a very quick check it seems the Youtube poster has accurately and conveniently summarised the known facts so far for his audience and for others.

It seems rather bizarre that your thread has been hijacked and derailed by a few people that overtly know very little about this Jeff Taylor chap but have already thrashed him. Maybe some are bitter about the actual disclosed contents, who knows, or care!

[sp1814]

CB

That's what I was getting at. I don't know who Jeff Taylor is and can't find out any info on him...but reading your post, I can't work out whether you *have* or have simply confirming his statements.

By the way - you're using the word 'overtly' incorrectly.

[naomi24]

SP. perhaps Khandro didn’t have an alternative source at the time. He knows him. I’ve no idea why you’re pursuing this. You have well known sources now - or did you want to detract from the subject?

[andy-hughes]

Khandro - // Not hard work at all. You were wrong in your assessment of Jeff Taylor, you were wrong in your judgement of his video without watching it - otherwise you might have made some comment on it's content - instead we got

"I'll listen to them over some chancer with a video camera and a distorted perspective on his irrelevant nonsense." //

What that clearly says is, I would take the information of one over the other, it does not in any way say that I would not listen to both and make a choice.

That is your assumption, like naomi, that I didn't watch the link.

I did watch it - as I pointed out to Naomi, who has as usual, slipped away until she can rejoin and pretend she didn;t say that.

But back to you, and what you are saying -

// You were wrong that what he said is irrelevant (read all the above links) and you were wrong to say that he is a 'chancer'. He has run a successful news channel with a large following for several years. //

I'd be really careful about using the word 'succsssful' when referring to Mr Taylor in YouTube terms - a medium which measures 'success' in terms of numbers of followers.

Mr Taylor has one-hundred-and-twenty-four thousand followers.

That's not 'successful'.

Kim Khardashian has eighty-one million followers - that is successful.

Maybe you should take your analysis of the news from her - she is far more influential on YouTube than your guy!

// In fact you are as wrong about Jeff Taylor as you were wrong about your unbelievable, dogged support for that despicable creature who ambushed the octogenarian, Lady Hussey. //

Really? You're going back to that again?

My support for Ms Fulani concerned the rudeness she received from the octogenarian (i.e. old enough to have learned some manners) Lady Hussey, and no 'ambushing' went on from either side, so do please can the hyperbole, it's nonsense.

[sp1814]

Hats off to AH.

Hats remaining firmly ON for naomi24.

It's fun here. Must remember to come back more often.

:-)

[andy-hughes]

CB - //t seems rather bizarre that your thread has been hijacked and derailed by a few people that overtly know very little about this Jeff Taylor chap but have ... already thrashed him. Maybe some are bitter about the actual disclosed contents, who knows, or care! //

I assume you mean 'trashed' rather than 'thrashed'!!

My only objection is to any idiot with a camera who pops up on YouTube and regurgitates existing news as though they are the first person to announce it, when obviously they never are, because they can only access the same media as everyone else.

Khandro likes to put these people up as though they know something the rest of us don't, or can't find out from genuine news outlets.

And then he gets nasty when other people don;t see his 'source' as wonderful, and to be respected.

It's all part of life's rich tapestry - but 'trashing'? That's the risk you take if you set yourself up as a pseudo-news source on YouTube.

[naomi24]

AH, how utterly ridiculous!
How can anyone here pretend they’ve not said what they’ve said? It’s there in black and white - your ramblings included. I don’t appreciate being called a liar - not the first time you’ve done it - and I stand by every word I’ve said. You protest too much.

[andy-hughes]

Naomi - // You didn't watch it - and yet you pontificate on its 'distorted perspective'. How typical. //

If you don't appreciate being called a liar, the answer is really simple - don't lie.

[andy-hughes]

Oh, and before anyone else leaps in -

And me a Mod too!!

[naomi24]

AH, i do not lie. If you don’t mean what you write don’t write it.

[andy-hughes]

Naomi - I watched the video.

You stated that I did not watch it.

That's a lie.

And I always mean what I post.

Own your lie and get over it.

It's you that protests too much.

[naomi24]

Your posts indicate otherwise. Perhaps yet another failure in your communication skills.

[andy-hughes]

What my posts 'indicate' or not, does not entitle you to lie about what you imagine, decide to make up as a fact, and then post on here.

You are a fantasist as well.

Keep digging why don't you, your integrity is evaporating with every swerve and denial.

[Togo]

Hymie will be along later to blame it on Brexit. I knew after the first "answer" that the thread was doomed. I have learned to steer clear of the subsequent rinse and repeat circus that follows. Corruption such as this has been happening for decades, those of us who railed against it have endured years of abuse from the enthralled EUSSR vassals. There is more to come. The facilitators caught in this "discovery" will sing like canaries to ease their own punishment. The question is who pressed, the equally corrupt, law enforcement agencies to act and how did they assert this pressure? The Ponzi scheme is unravelling.

[Peter Pedant]

no please stop you two

[naomi24]

AH, There’s an awful lot if confusion around your posts. You so often haven’t said what others think you’ve said so the less you say about integrity the better. This is ridiculous. It’s like trying to converse with a petulant teenager - and it’s thread after thread after thread - that you’re involved in - and it’s tedious. Look to yourself AH. I’m tired of indulging you.

[Togo]

The op had a video that was 8minute 57sec long. The first answer was posted after reading the op header, loading and watching the video, considering and composing a "reply" in 9 minutes ... and if you believe that you are in need of help too.

[andy-hughes]

Togo, if you are so keen on time differences, did it escape your notice, on your eagerness to jump in, that my initial post and Naomi's accusation that I have not viewed the clip, are actually nine hours apart?

I didn't state when I watched the link, I merely confirmed that I have watched it.

You have fallen over your own eagerness to have a go at me.

Fortunately, that just makes you look foolish, beats being a liar any day.

[Zacs-Master]

21:24 OP posted
21:35 AH makes first comment.

Fastest opinion in the West there, son. Yeeeha.