News5 mins ago
No Way Back For Harry?
What with Harry's extraordinary attack on his brother and Meghan's take on Meghan being perfection personified, can the rift ever be healed?
Harry spoke quite wistfully, I thought, of his life with his family, an impression that didn’t diminish when he referred to his Californian residence as 'home sweet home' and said this is where he is meant to be, or words to that effect. Somehow I couldn't quite believe he meant it. It's all so very sad.
https:/ /www.in depende nt.co.u k/arts- enterta inment/ tv/news /harry- meghan- netflix -reacti ons-mis carriag e-beyon ce-tyle r-perry -b22463 86.html
Harry spoke quite wistfully, I thought, of his life with his family, an impression that didn’t diminish when he referred to his Californian residence as 'home sweet home' and said this is where he is meant to be, or words to that effect. Somehow I couldn't quite believe he meant it. It's all so very sad.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.O_G
You wrote:
"If pnly they could do it more privately and stop bunging up the newspapers with their antics."
It's the fault of the newspapers and their readers that we're being saturated, not H&M.
If people refused to read stories about them, then newspapers would simply turn elsewhere.
Sixty-five stories (Daily Mail) in 24 hours isn't covering the story, it's swamping their readers.
If England won the World Cup and your newspaper of choice dedicated the first thirty pages to the story, would you write, "Why are the England team swamping my paper?"
You wrote:
"If pnly they could do it more privately and stop bunging up the newspapers with their antics."
It's the fault of the newspapers and their readers that we're being saturated, not H&M.
If people refused to read stories about them, then newspapers would simply turn elsewhere.
Sixty-five stories (Daily Mail) in 24 hours isn't covering the story, it's swamping their readers.
If England won the World Cup and your newspaper of choice dedicated the first thirty pages to the story, would you write, "Why are the England team swamping my paper?"
naomi24
"Their titles were conferred upon them. As the wife of the Prince of Wales, Diana’s title was hers by right."
Interesting...so should Harry revert back to being Prince Harry. That was his title by birthright.
Thinking about it - haven't you got it the wrong way around? Diana was only a princess because she was married to a prince. It was conferred upon marriage.
"Their titles were conferred upon them. As the wife of the Prince of Wales, Diana’s title was hers by right."
Interesting...so should Harry revert back to being Prince Harry. That was his title by birthright.
Thinking about it - haven't you got it the wrong way around? Diana was only a princess because she was married to a prince. It was conferred upon marriage.