News1 min ago
No Way Back For Harry?
What with Harry's extraordinary attack on his brother and Meghan's take on Meghan being perfection personified, can the rift ever be healed?
Harry spoke quite wistfully, I thought, of his life with his family, an impression that didn’t diminish when he referred to his Californian residence as 'home sweet home' and said this is where he is meant to be, or words to that effect. Somehow I couldn't quite believe he meant it. It's all so very sad.
https:/ /www.in depende nt.co.u k/arts- enterta inment/ tv/news /harry- meghan- netflix -reacti ons-mis carriag e-beyon ce-tyle r-perry -b22463 86.html
Harry spoke quite wistfully, I thought, of his life with his family, an impression that didn’t diminish when he referred to his Californian residence as 'home sweet home' and said this is where he is meant to be, or words to that effect. Somehow I couldn't quite believe he meant it. It's all so very sad.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.i do not fully understand the allegations that megan and harry make about the royal family because talking about how “the palace” responds to xyz in the media makes me lose the will to live and that seems to be most of it…
… i imagine it must be really serious for NJ to call him “despicable wretch” and for people to say they cannot stand him…
… i imagine it must be really serious for NJ to call him “despicable wretch” and for people to say they cannot stand him…
Even though she was a member of the aristocracy, Diana was still considered a commoner insofar as she was not of royal birth.
Technically, Meghan is a princess since she is married to a prince. I believe on Archie's birth certificate she is shown as "Princess of the United Kingdom". However, since her husband has a royal dukedom she is known as a Duchess (a royal dukedom outranks a Prince). Were they to be stripped of the Sussex titles she would be Princess Henry. The Princess of Wales was still a princess before being PoW for the same reasons, despite the fact she had the title of Duchess.
I really did have a lot of time for them at first and I did feel she got a raw deal by the press (if the DoC did something it was marvellous, whereas if the DoS did the same it was scorned). However, she has now turned this into a proper whinge fest based on racism (I never saw her as a woman of colour, I saw her as someone H loved) and other imagined slights. I cant help thinking that the way she has been treated is a reaction to the way she has behaved - not because she is of colour (her mother, for example, save for her involvement in this docufantasy has been dignified and gracious and I have always admired her) but because of her bleating self-obsessed, narcissistic, demanding way of conducting herself. She's also full of BS and the story changes to suit the agenda.
I think the King has behaved with remarkable restraint. I understand he will not tolerate anyone making negative remarks about his son. But he is a father first and King second. He must be very very weary of all this and very very sad that his younger son seems intent on a path of destruction that even his ex-wife would not go down. I do not imagine Diana would be proud of the way her youngest has behaved.
Technically, Meghan is a princess since she is married to a prince. I believe on Archie's birth certificate she is shown as "Princess of the United Kingdom". However, since her husband has a royal dukedom she is known as a Duchess (a royal dukedom outranks a Prince). Were they to be stripped of the Sussex titles she would be Princess Henry. The Princess of Wales was still a princess before being PoW for the same reasons, despite the fact she had the title of Duchess.
I really did have a lot of time for them at first and I did feel she got a raw deal by the press (if the DoC did something it was marvellous, whereas if the DoS did the same it was scorned). However, she has now turned this into a proper whinge fest based on racism (I never saw her as a woman of colour, I saw her as someone H loved) and other imagined slights. I cant help thinking that the way she has been treated is a reaction to the way she has behaved - not because she is of colour (her mother, for example, save for her involvement in this docufantasy has been dignified and gracious and I have always admired her) but because of her bleating self-obsessed, narcissistic, demanding way of conducting herself. She's also full of BS and the story changes to suit the agenda.
I think the King has behaved with remarkable restraint. I understand he will not tolerate anyone making negative remarks about his son. But he is a father first and King second. He must be very very weary of all this and very very sad that his younger son seems intent on a path of destruction that even his ex-wife would not go down. I do not imagine Diana would be proud of the way her youngest has behaved.
The RF is not composed of very intelligent individuals. They've been selected over the generations for reproductive ability, longevity and willingness to tolerate a world where they are subordinate to a democratic government. They do all that quite well, but it can be hard on individual members if they turn out not to have the right qualities.