News0 min ago
What Happened To Numeracy?
218 Answers
https:/
Not sure what the PM means by, pupils will study Maths until 18, I assume he means the ones that are still in education. Anyway I find it shocking that:
"Around eight million adults in England have the numeracy skills of primary school children, " - so what happened? Why are we so innumerate as a nation? I'm not talking about Calculus here just basic 'rithmetic.
Not sure what the PM means by, pupils will study Maths until 18, I assume he means the ones that are still in education. Anyway I find it shocking that:
"Around eight million adults in England have the numeracy skills of primary school children, " - so what happened? Why are we so innumerate as a nation? I'm not talking about Calculus here just basic 'rithmetic.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
zebu 1729:"TTT //"numeracy skills intended to deal with unknowns?"-Of course//
Surely numeracy skills have to incorporate real life applications.
For example;
Student measures the length and width of a room and finds their respective values to be 4 metres and 3 metres. Multiplying these two values (4 x 3) gives 12 square metres or 12 m²
Subsequently student purchases carpet to cover floor of room.
Whereas topics such as algebra and trig, would require the student to transpose formula and/or have available a set of tables.
Does this not go outside the bounds of numeracy? ", no it's a very simple problem that an primary school kid could do.
Surely numeracy skills have to incorporate real life applications.
For example;
Student measures the length and width of a room and finds their respective values to be 4 metres and 3 metres. Multiplying these two values (4 x 3) gives 12 square metres or 12 m²
Subsequently student purchases carpet to cover floor of room.
Whereas topics such as algebra and trig, would require the student to transpose formula and/or have available a set of tables.
Does this not go outside the bounds of numeracy? ", no it's a very simple problem that an primary school kid could do.
//I don't remember learning any of the above in school but that was around 35-40 years ago.//
No you wouldn’t, Tigger. But you were taught how to add up, subtract, multiply and divide, which of those was appropriate to what you wanted to do and which order to do them in.
//5p//
Correct. Method: deduct the “excess” from the total; divide what’s left by 2 and that’s the cost of the cheapest item. This is not really maths. The only arithmetic involved is taking £1 away from £1.10 and dividing 10 by 2. But it demonstrates perfectly that having a calculator will not solve everything. I solved such puzzles at primary school. We called them “problems.”
I have ‘A’ Level maths (‘B’ Grade). I passed when an ‘A’ Level was an ‘A’ Level (rather than now, where they appear to be 'O' Levels which take two years longer to gain than mine did). I have a better understanding of maths than my nephew who gained a 2:1 in Physics fifteen years ago. He has ‘A’ Level maths but his competence in the subject is not really much better than mine was at ‘O’ Level. But then I went to a grammar school and he didn’t (because there were none where he lived).
Many people I encounter are “astonished” that I can add up two or three sums of money in my head. They are only astonished because it has never occurred to them to learn how to do so and they’ve never been encouraged to try. But this isn’t maths. This is arithmetic and it is woefully lacking in large numbers of people under about sixty.
Mr Sunak could keep pupils in school learning Maths until they are 88. It would make no difference to their competence in the subject.
No you wouldn’t, Tigger. But you were taught how to add up, subtract, multiply and divide, which of those was appropriate to what you wanted to do and which order to do them in.
//5p//
Correct. Method: deduct the “excess” from the total; divide what’s left by 2 and that’s the cost of the cheapest item. This is not really maths. The only arithmetic involved is taking £1 away from £1.10 and dividing 10 by 2. But it demonstrates perfectly that having a calculator will not solve everything. I solved such puzzles at primary school. We called them “problems.”
I have ‘A’ Level maths (‘B’ Grade). I passed when an ‘A’ Level was an ‘A’ Level (rather than now, where they appear to be 'O' Levels which take two years longer to gain than mine did). I have a better understanding of maths than my nephew who gained a 2:1 in Physics fifteen years ago. He has ‘A’ Level maths but his competence in the subject is not really much better than mine was at ‘O’ Level. But then I went to a grammar school and he didn’t (because there were none where he lived).
Many people I encounter are “astonished” that I can add up two or three sums of money in my head. They are only astonished because it has never occurred to them to learn how to do so and they’ve never been encouraged to try. But this isn’t maths. This is arithmetic and it is woefully lacking in large numbers of people under about sixty.
Mr Sunak could keep pupils in school learning Maths until they are 88. It would make no difference to their competence in the subject.
//And has that been a constant help to you throughout your life ?//
That sarcasm shows your missing the point gromit, maybe deliberate of course as its TTT your aiming it at,.... its the skill of analyticle thinking & breaking a problem down and applying arithmatic skills that them sort of problems helps with in real life/buisness
That sarcasm shows your missing the point gromit, maybe deliberate of course as its TTT your aiming it at,.... its the skill of analyticle thinking & breaking a problem down and applying arithmatic skills that them sort of problems helps with in real life/buisness
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.